15

I am puzzled by the overlap between Programmers SE and Stack Overflow. I suppose the topic has already undergone a lengthy, heated debate, but I can't resist (re-?)discussing the following specific bullets from the FAQs.

From the FAQ at Programmers:

This can include topics such as: (snip)

  • Practical algorithms and data structures

From the FAQ at Stack Overflow:

...but if your question generally covers... (snip)

  • A software algorithm

So where do I ask about, say, bubble-sort?

Improve this question
6
  • 5
    Also, SO: software tools commonly used by programmers P.SE: Developer tools and techniques Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 2:11
  • 1
    I had a question that was supposedly migrated to "programmers" today, but it isn't even a programming question - I was looking for information about the movie "Sorting out Sorting". It's not clear to me how that's a question about sorting - while it's a matter that's "unique to the programming profession" (from SO's FAQ), it's not a question about programming itself - it's a question about a movie about programming. Add to that the fact that the "migrated" link leads to a 404 on programmers.sE, and I'm left very confused as to what's going on. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 2:42
  • 4
    I always thought that "StackOverflow" was for questions about programming tasks and "Programmers" was more for questions about the developer as a person. For example: What tool you use/prefer for your line of work? (PE) How to use this tool for this task? (SO). Asking for how to implement some algorithm should be SO field. I don't understand the meaning of "Practical algorithms and data structures", and I even less understand how this is PE field. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 18:05
  • The more I think about this, the more I end up concluding that I don't see a real need for Programmers SE (or Comp Sci SE, for that matter). The whole thing reeks with SE inflation, generating more specific sites than is useful/appropriate IMHO. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 22:55
  • I see a field for Comp Sci SE: general programing concepts (all the lamba-calculus/functional "novelty", i.e.) and algorithm study (complexity comparison, i.e.). Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 23:37
  • possible duplicate of Choosing between Stack Overflow and Programmers Stack Exchange Commented Mar 23, 2012 at 11:02

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
13

If the solution to your problem is likely a big picture / white board solution involving no or minimal code, it is a good fit for programmers.

If the solution to your problem involves specific code it is probably a good fit for Stack Overflow.

Example:

Which sorting algorithm is best for <specific problem I am having>?

belongs on Programmers

How would I implement bubble sort in 8086 assembly?

belongs on Stack Overflow

Improve this answer
5
  • 1
    Where would you put a question on the computational complexity of bubblesort? No code, but hardly subjective... Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 2:12
  • 8
    I am pretty sure I would consider your first variant to be perfectly appropriate on SO, and answer away happily without migration to Programmers SE crossing my mind. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 2:13
  • 3
    @shog imho ... computational complexity belongs on SO or even the Comp Sci SE ... Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 2:20
  • 6
    If SO turns into please-send-me-the-codez it would be a real shame. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 13:35
  • +1 for "Comp Sci SE" reference. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 17:48
4

I agree that the distinction between these two sites is currently very blurred. For example, three of my top ten tags on SO are git, svn, and version-control. Since none of these questions deal with actual source code, do they all now belong on P.SE, because of

  • Developer tools and techniques

or should they stay on SO because of

  • software tools commonly used by programmers

?

From the start of Programmers.SE, I was always under the impression that it was for questions about the craft of programming. However, my primary site of focus is SO, so I haven't really been keeping up on P.SE to see how it's changed. But it seems to have changed a lot from what I first learned, by the time it now has gone "public". When did "practical algorithms and data structures" become off topic for SO?

Here's how I would modify the P.SE topic list:

  • Software engineering
  • Developer testing
  • Developer tools and techniques
  • Practical algorithms and data structures
  • Design patterns
  • Architecture
  • Development methodologies
  • Quality assurance
  • Learning resources and techniques
  • Software law
  • Programming puzzles
  • Freelancing and business concerns
Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    "When did "practical algorithms and data structures" become off topic for SO?" It isn't, unless the question has zero code. If it's a question with code about data structures, it belongs on SO. Commented Dec 30, 2010 at 23:46
  • I agree with the tools part wholeheartedly, though -- there's no practical way to involve code in developer tools, so I removed that one. I also added the word "concepts" to algorithms and data structures to make it more clear on the whiteboard vs code paradigm. Commented Dec 31, 2010 at 1:44

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.