Commons talk:Administrators
- Archive 1: April 2005 - March 2006.
- Archive 2: April 2006 - September 2007
- Archive 3: October 2007 - October 2011
Contents |
Ask for blocking [edit]
An unknown user repeatedly and with no reason reverts edits of User:JanSuchy in two files - see his activity: [1] Thanks! --PetrS. (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Done I have warned him and will block him the next time it happens. However, I also put a {{delete}} on File:SVT 137 154 modell Piko a.jpg as it is a copyvio of both the packaging and the model.
- And, this page is for discussions about Administrators and their role. For your future reference, the place to request blocks is Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections.
- Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Review [edit]
I need someone to confirm or review this File:Webb Simpson cropped.jpg. Thanks!HotHat (talk) 03:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Done by Ww2censor (talk · contribs) --Sreejith K (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Removal of Administratorship [edit]
Is there a process where one can vote to remove admin status from people who are not deemed suitable at all? I am referring to an admin going amok at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Santon (figurine). Mass deletion requests of this sort without even haveing a look at each file is for me obviously a grave misconduct, and I'd even like to block that user completely. That somebody like that is an administrator is hardly bearable. --FA2010 (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- We have Commons:Administrators/De-adminship#De-adminship process as a result of abuse of power. I'll neither recommend nor discourage starting the process for this, though. --whym (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Voting [edit]
As everyone can check e.g. at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Ralf Roletschek commons crats actually do count neutral votes (14/(14+11) = 56% but 14/(14+11+3) = 50%). Thats why I changed the text on the page. Just in case someone wonders ... a×pdeHello! 14:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think you should unilaterally change long-standing policy like that. What you can do is point it out to the crat in question that they're not following the policy. Jafeluv (talk) 19:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Also I'm sure you already know about the community consensus on the matter. After all, it was you who started the RFC in the first place. Jafeluv (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
-
- I didn't unilaterally change long-standing policy, EugeneZelenko did do that. I was just stating the facts! Why does he still ignore community consensus and noone interferes? a×pdeHello! 22:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- As I said, I think you're posting on the wrong page. Here's the link: User talk:EugeneZelenko. Jafeluv (talk) 06:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I already told EugeneZelenko to change vote counting, but he didn't change. So what shall I do? Block him for ignoring community consensus? a×pdeHello! 17:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Another try: User talk:EugeneZelenko#voting a×pdeHello! 17:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
-
-