Tell me more ×
Code Review Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for peer programmer code reviews. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 2 down vote favorite

I did a load test for an ASP.NET MVC application. It was basically for 2 different pages which are doing the same thing but one was synchronous and the other was asynchronous. The result was shocking. While average response time for the synchronous one is about 11.2 seconds, it is 3.65 for asynchronous one. I think the difference is pretty compelling and overwhelming.

I have written a blog post on that as well:

Task-base Asynchronous Programming in C# 5.0 and ASP.NET MVC Web Applications

That'd be great to have a peer review on that blog post.

share|improve this question

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote

Thank you for the link. I think it is carefully written and it describes your experience in a comprehensive way. I like very much, that you do not only provide source code along with some explanations, but also provide statistical results. So I ask you to remove the section "precautions". Be more self-confident, you don't need to scare off potential readers. You know what you're writing about! It is sufficient to put a note below the text indicating that any tips, improvements and discussions are welcome.

share|improve this answer
thanks for looking at it. I removed the precautions part as you suggested. – tugberk Feb 27 '12 at 12:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.