Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have to prove that $(C^1[0,1],d_1)$ is complete metric space, where $d_1(f,g)=\max|f(x)-g(x)|+\max|f'(x)-g'(x)|,x\in[0,1]$

Firstly, I take an arbitrary Cauchy sequence of functions from $C^1[0,1]$, $\langle f_n(x):x\in[0,1]\rangle$.
Since it is Cauchy's, it holds$$(\forall\epsilon>0)(\exists n_0\in N)(\forall n,m\geq n_0)(d_1(f_n,f_m)<\epsilon)$$ i.e. $$(\forall\epsilon>0)(\exists n_0\in N)(\forall n,m\geq n_0)(d_1(f,g)=\max|f(x)-g(x)|+\max|f'(x)-g'(x)|,x\in[0,1])$$

From this I have

  1. $(\forall\epsilon>0)(\exists n_0\in N)(\forall n,m\geq n_0)\max|f_n(x)-f_m(x)|<\epsilon$
  2. $(\forall\epsilon>0)(\exists n_0\in N)(\forall n,m\geq n_0)\max|f_n'(x)-f_m'(x)|<\epsilon$

I will skip what I was doing now and I will just write that I found that there exists $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ such that $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}f_n(x)=f(x)$ and $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}f_n'(x)=g(x)$.

I have written in my notebook that I have to show now that $f\in C[0,1]$, $g\in C[0,1]$ and $f'=g$.

It's clear to me why do I have to show that $g\in C[0,1]$ and $f'=g$, but don't I have to show for $f$ that $f\in C^1[0,1]$?

share|cite|improve this question
    
If you did the first two, then by virtue of finding a continuous derivative for $f$ on $[0,1]$ you've proven $f$ is continuously differentiable there. – Jonathan Y. Aug 25 '13 at 12:25
    
Note that in order to show $d_1$ convergence to $f$ we'd need more than having $f,g$ the pointwise limit of $f_n,f_n^\prime$, respectively. We require uniform convergence on $[0,1]$. – Jonathan Y. Aug 25 '13 at 12:27
    
Yes, I have proven that $f$ is uniformly convergent at $[0,1]$. So, that's correct? I thought that I maybe rewrote it wrong from the blackboard. – gov Aug 25 '13 at 12:30
    
That the $f_n$'s uniformly converge to $f$, and their derivatives uniformly converge to $f^\prime$, yes. – Jonathan Y. Aug 25 '13 at 12:37
    
Sorry, I have proven that $f$ is uniformly continuous. – gov Aug 25 '13 at 12:41

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

$C^1[0,1]$ is the set of all function on $[0,1]$ having continuous first order partial derivative.

Consider a Cauchy sequence $\{f_n(x)\}_n$ on $C^1[0,1]$. So for any $\epsilon > 0$ $\exists$ $m_1 \in \mathbb{N}$, s.t.$\forall$ natural numbers $p , q > m_1$ $d_1(f_p,f_q) < \epsilon$.

$d_1(f_p(x),f_q(x)) = \max_{x \in [0,1]}|f_p(x) - f_q(x)| + \max_{x \in [0,1]}|f'_p(x) - f'_q(x)| < \epsilon$.

So we are getting the followings.

$$\max_{x \in [0,1]}|f_p(x) - f_q(x)| < \epsilon$$

and

$$\max_{x \in [0,1]}|f'_p(x) - f'_q(x)| < \epsilon$$

We know the set on all continuous function on a closed bounded set of $\mathbb{R}$ with the metric $d(f(x),g(x)) = \max|f(x) - g(x)|$ is complete. Thus both the sequences $\{f_n(x)\}$ and $\{f'_n(x)\}$ are convergent and let converges to $f(x)$ and $g(x)$. Also the convergence is uniform.

We also know if $\{f_n(x)\}$ converges at least one point in its domain of definition, $\{f'_n(x)\}$ exists and converges uniformly to a function $g(x)$, then the sequence of functions $\{f_n(x)\}$ converges uniformly to a function $f(x)$ s.t $f'(x) = g(x)$.

So for any fixed $\epsilon > 0$ and $\forall x \in [0,1]$ $|f_n(x) - f(x)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$ when $n > m_2$ and $|f'_n(x) - f'(x)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$ when $n > m_3$.

So $\exists k > \max{m_1, m_2}$ s.t.

$$\max_{x \in [0,1]}|f_n(x) - f(x)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$$

and

$$\max_{x \in [0,1]}|f'_n(x) - f'(x)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$$

Combining them we shall get $d_1(f_n(x),f(x)) < \epsilon$ whenever $n > k$

Thus any Cauchy sequence in $(C^1[0,1], d_1)$ is convergent and hence the space is complete.

The results I have used here will be available in any standerd text book on Real Analysis.

share|cite|improve this answer

We'll follow the stages you've outlined.

  1. Take some $d_1$-Cauchy sequence $(f_n)\subseteq C^1([0,1])$. So we know that for all $x_0\in[0,1]$ the sequecnes $\left(f_n(x_0)\right)_{n\geq 0}$, $\left(f_n^\prime(x_0)\right)_{n\geq 0}$ are Cauchy sequences in $\mathbb{R}$, hence converging. We will denote their limits $f(x_0),g(x_0)$, respectively.

  2. For all $\epsilon>0$, we take $N>0$ such that for all $n,m>N$ it holds that $\max_{t\in[0,1]}|f_n(t)-f_m(t)|\leq\epsilon$. Then for all $t\in[0,1]$, $n>N$ we have $$|f_n(t)-f(t)| \mathop{\leq}_{\forall k} |f_n(t)-f_{n+k}(t)| + |f_{n+k}(t)-f(t)| \leq \epsilon + |f_{n+k}(t)-f(t)|\mathop{\longrightarrow}_{k\to\infty} \epsilon$$ Put differently $\sup_{t\in[0,1]}|f_n(t)-f(t)|\to 0$.

  3. Similarly, $\sup_{t\in[0,1]}|f_n^\prime(t)-g(t)|\to 0$.

  4. For all $n\geq 0$, $x\in[0,1]$ it holds that $f_n(x) = \int_0^x f_n^\prime(t)dt$, hence using parts 2-3 we take for all $x\in[0,1]$, $\epsilon>0$ an index $N>0$ such that $n>N$ implies $\sup_{t\in[0,1]}|f_n(t)-f(t)|,\sup_{t\in[0,1]}|f_n^\prime(t)-g(t)|\leq\frac{\epsilon}{2}$. We then have $$|f(x) - \int_0^x g(t)dt| = \left|f(x) - f_n(x) + \int_0^x f_n^\prime(t)dt - \int_0^x g(t)dt\right| \leq\\ \leq |f(x) - f_n(x)| + \int_0^x\left|f_n^\prime(t)-g(t)\right|dt \leq \frac{\epsilon}{2} + (x-0)\frac{\epsilon}{2}\leq\epsilon.$$ Such is the case for all $\epsilon>0$, hence $f(x)=\int_0^x g(t)dt$ (for all $x\in[0,1]$). This implies that $f\in C^1([0,1])$ with $f^\prime = g$.

  5. Finally, using parts 2-3 again, we have $d_1(f_n,f)\mathop{\longrightarrow}_{n\to\infty}0$, as desired.

So, again, it's not any uniform continuity as the fact that $f_n\to f$ uniformly and $f_n^\prime\to g=f^\prime$ uniformly, and that this also implies $f\in C^1([0,1])$, so that everything works as it should.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.