datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.4.0, 2014-04-22
Report a bug

IPv6 Transition Technologies Selection using DHCP/DHCPv6
draft-yang-v6ops-ipv6tran-select-02

Document type: Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Document stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2013-10-21
Intended RFC status: Unknown
Other versions: plain text, pdf, html

Stream State:No stream defined
Document shepherd: No shepherd assigned

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

Internet Engineering Task Force                                  T. Yang
Internet-Draft                                                     L. Li
Intended status: Informational                                     Q. Ma
Expires: April 24, 2014                                     China Mobile
                                                            Oct 21, 2013

        IPv6 Transition Technologies Selection using DHCP/DHCPv6
                  draft-yang-v6ops-ipv6tran-select-02

Abstract

   Nowadays, many IPv6 transition technologies has been proposed, such
   as Dual-Stack, DS-Lite, 6rd and so on.  An CPE may support some of
   them instead of only one.  But ISPs usually deploy just an unique
   transition technology in an area, for example, under a BRAS/SR or in
   a MAN.  So they must control all the CPEs to ues the exact transition
   tech through the CPEs' management system or configuring them before
   issuing to the customers.  Another question is that if subscriber buy
   a new CPE from supermarket to substitute the one received from the
   ISP, he may not access internet because of the wrong configuration.

   To solve these problems,this document defines a new DHCP/DHCPv6
   option named TRAN_TYPE which can control CPEs to select the
   appropriate IPv6 transition technology which ISP deployed instend of
   the CPEs' default configration.  This method can also solve the
   configurating problem when various CPEs work together without a
   uniform configuration in advance.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 24, 2014.

Copyright Notice

Yang, et al.             Expires April 24, 2014                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               IPv6tran-select                    Oct 2013

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  DHCP Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   4.  DHCPv6 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   5.  Other questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
   8.  Refrences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Yang, et al.             Expires April 24, 2014                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft               IPv6tran-select                    Oct 2013

1.  Introduction

   Nowadays, many IPv6 transitioning technologies has been proposed such
   as Dual-Stack, DS-Lite, 6rd and so on.  Each of them proposes
   individual requirment to the CPEs.  To promote the competitive
   ability of products,the CPE manufacturers certainly will try to
   support more technologies as much as possible.  Meanwhile, the
   operators tend to use single or less technologies.  Moreover, users
   can buy and use their own equipments instead of using the one which
   operator gives them, that will bring the diversity of CPEs.

   Assume that an operator uses one transitioning strategy in its
   network.  There are two ways to make the CPEs available.  The first
   one is to make a pre-configuration for each CPE in advance.  But,
   when the users modify the configuration or change to their own
   equipment, the connection will fail.  The Second method is to deploy

[include full document text]