Take the 2-minute tour ×
Code Review Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for peer programmer code reviews. It's 100% free, no registration required.

So I wrote this function to convert a given number to its interpretation in the English language as part of the Project Euler exercises. It works fine, but I sense that it's rather sloppy and inelegant, especially for Python where many things can be done quickly in a couple of lines. Any feedback on how to make this code more beautiful/Pythonic is appreciated!

NUMBER_WORDS = {
    1 : "one",
    2 : "two",
    3 : "three",
    4 : "four",
    5 : "five",
    6 : "six",
    7 : "seven",
    8 : "eight",
    9 : "nine",
    10 : "ten",
    11 : "eleven",
    12 : "twelve",
    13 : "thirteen",
    14 : "fourteen",
    15 : "fifteen",
    16 : "sixteen",
    17 : "seventeen",
    18 : "eighteen",
    19 : "nineteen",
    20 : "twenty",
    30 : "thirty",
    40 : "forty",
    50 : "fifty",
    60 : "sixty",
    70 : "seventy",
    80 : "eighty",
    90 : "ninety"
}

def convert_number_to_words(num):
    #Works up to 99,999
    num = str(num)
    analyze = 0
    postfix = remainder = None
    string = ""
    if len(num) > 4:
        analyze = int(num[0:2])
        remainder = num[2:]
        postfix = " thousand "
    elif len(num) > 3:
        analyze = int(num[0:1])
        remainder = num[1:]
        postfix = " thousand "
    elif len(num) > 2:
        analyze = int(num[0:1])
        remainder = num[1:]
        postfix = " hundred "
        if int(remainder) > 0:
            postfix += "and "
    elif int(num) in NUMBER_WORDS:
        analyze = int(num)
    else:
        analyze = int(num[0:1] + "0")
        remainder = num[1:]
        postfix = "-"
    string = NUMBER_WORDS[analyze]
    if postfix is not None:
        string += postfix
    if remainder is not None and int(remainder) > 0:
        return string + convert_number_to_words(remainder)
    else:
        return string
share|improve this question
    
"And" is normally reserved for writing out fractions. 13,500 would be "thirteen thousand and five hundred" in your example, but would be said as "thirteen thousand five hundred". –  TyCobb Jan 13 at 21:48
    
@TyCobb Ah, good point. Editted. I'm with you that "and" shouldn't be included at all, but it's in the directions of the problem: projecteuler.net/problem=17 –  Jeff Gohlke Jan 13 at 21:55
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here's one using modulo % and list joining that uses your original NUMBER_WORDS dict:

def int_to_english(n):
    english_parts = []
    ones = n % 10
    tens = n % 100
    hundreds = math.floor(n / 100) % 10
    thousands = math.floor(n / 1000)

    if thousands:
        english_parts.append(int_to_english(thousands))
        english_parts.append('thousand')
        if not hundreds and tens:
            english_parts.append('and')
    if hundreds:
        english_parts.append(NUMBER_WORDS[hundreds])
        english_parts.append('hundred')
        if tens:
            english_parts.append('and')
    if tens:
        if tens < 20 or ones == 0:
            english_parts.append(NUMBER_WORDS[tens])
        else:
            english_parts.append(NUMBER_WORDS[tens - ones])
            english_parts.append(NUMBER_WORDS[ones])
    return ' '.join(english_parts)

It works up to 999,999, but could be extended further with a little customisation.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.