Take the 2-minute tour ×
Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In this simplified scenario, I have two files: index.htm, lazy.htm.

index.htm:

var myApp = angular.module('myApp', []);
myApp.controller('embed',function($scope){
    $scope.embed = 'Embedded Controller';
});                  
<div ng-controller="embed">{{embed}}</div>    
<div ng-include="'lazy.htm'"></div>

lazy.htm

myApp.controller('lazy',function($scope){
    $scope.lazy = 'Lazy Controller';
});
<div ng-controller="lazy">
    {{lazy}}
</div>

The result is an error: "Argument 'lazy' is not a function, got undefined"

Using a function instead

lazy.htm

function lazy($scope) {
    $scope.lazy = 'Lazy Controller';
}
<div ng-controller="lazy">
    {{lazy}}
</div>

This works until version 1.3 beta 14. In beta 15 was removed the global controller functions: https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/8296

So now, what is the better way to get angularized contents of lazy.htm dynamically?

UPDATE:

In this article (http://ify.io/lazy-loading-in-angularjs) I found another possible solution. The $controllerProvider allow us to register new controllers after angular bootstrap. Works like a charm. Tested in v1.3.0-beta.18

index.htm:

var myApp = angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('embed',function($scope){
    $scope.embed = 'Embedded Controller';
})
.config(function($controllerProvider) {
    myApp.cp = $controllerProvider;
});

<div ng-controller="embed">{{embed}}</div>    
<div ng-include="'lazy.htm'"></div>

lazy.htm

myApp.cp.register('lazy',function($scope){
    $scope.lazy = 'Lazy Controller';
});
<div ng-controller="lazy">
    {{lazy}}
</div>

UPDATE 2:

Two other alternatives that works are:

lazy.htm

_app = $('[ng-app]').scope();    
_app.lazy = function($scope) {
    $scope.lazy = 'Lazy Controller';
};

OR

var $rootScope = $('[ng-app]').injector().get('$rootScope');        
$rootScope.lazy = function($scope) {
    $scope.lazy = 'Lazy Controller';
}; 

But I believe these last two examples should not be used in production.

share|improve this question
1  
I also found requirejs hard to use with other libraries and vice-versa. That is why I created a library which is much easier to use and is tested with angular. There is a demo application at the bottom: gngeorgiev.github.io/Modulerr.js You can also combine all scripts into one without the dependency to Modulerr.js –  Georgi-it Aug 10 at 21:29

2 Answers 2

The best way to do what you are asking is to instead use a directive and tie the controller and template together that way so its bound at the appropriate time. Currently, the binding it not happening in lazy.htm at the right time unless you declare a global function as you've shown in your second example.

share|improve this answer

Ideally - Angular will force you to separate HTML and JS as in newer versions this may be enforced more often.

You may have to use requireJS http://solutionoptimist.com/2013/09/30/requirejs-angularjs-dependency-injection/

For the sake of trick can you try

ng-controller-controller="'lazy'"

or

In HTML

ng-controller-controller="myObject.controller"

Somewhere inject

$scope.myObject.controller = $controller('lazy', {$scope: $scope})
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.