22

Thanks to the great article from Dan Wahlin, I managed to implement lazy loading of Angular's controllers and services. However, there does not seem to be a clean way to lazy load independent modules.

To better explain my question, assume that I have an app would be structure as below without RequireJS:

// Create independent module 'dataServices' module with 'Pictures' object
angular.module("dataServices", []).factory("Pictures", function (...) {...});

// Create 'webapp' ng-app, with dependency to 'dataServices', defining controllers
angular.module("webapp", ['dataServices'])
.controller("View1Controller", function (...) {...})
.controller("View2Controller", function (...) {...});

Here is the sample app with RequireJS in Plunker:
http://plnkr.co/aiarzVpMJchYPjFRrkwn

The core of the problem is that Angular does not allow adding dependency to ng-app post instantiation. As result, my solution is to use angular.injector to retrieve the instance of Picture object to be used in my View2Controller. See js/scripts/controllers/ctrl2.js file.

This creates 2 problems for me:

  1. The injected services runs outside of angular and therefore all async call must end with $scope.$apply()
  2. Messy code where some object can be injected using standard angular syntax while others require the explicit use of injector.

Have any of you figured out how to lazy load independent module using RequireJS and somehow hook this module in angular so normal angular dependency injection syntax can be used?

Note:
The question is on lazy loading of independent module. One simple solution to this specific example is to create "Pictures" object using cached $providers during ng-app.config but that is not what I am looking for. I am looking for solution that works with 3rd party module such as angular-resource.

2

3 Answers 3

17

I finalized my own implementation called angularAMD and here is the sample site that uses it:

http://marcoslin.github.io/angularAMD/

It handles config functions and out of order module definitions.

Hopefully this can help other looking for something to help them with RequireJS and AngularJS integration.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

Hi i am trying to implement angularAMD. Does using it have to follow your folder structure?? I want to include the services and directives if they are in different folders? Can i do that?
@VishwaKumar no, you do not need to follow my folder structure at all. It is all relative to baseUrl in your main.js.
@marcoseu: Please look over the issue(not solved yet) : github.com/marcoslin/angularAMD/issues/148
10

Take a look at my project in GitHub: angular-require-lazy

This project is intended to demonstrate an idea and motivate discussions. But is does what you want (check expenses-view.js, it loads ng-grid lazily).

I am very interested in comments, ideas etc.


(EDIT) The ng-grid Angular module is lazy loaded as follows:

  1. expenses-view.js is loaded lazily, when the /expenses route is activated
  2. expenses-view.js specifies ng-grid as a dependency, so RequireJs loads ng-grid first
  3. ng-grid is the one that calls angular.module(...)

In order to accomplish this, I replaced (proxied actually) the real angular.module method with my own, that supports laziness. See bootstrap.js and route-config.js (the functions initLazyModules() and callRunBlocks()).

This implementation has its drawbacks that you should be aware of:

  1. Config functions are not implemented (yet). I do not know if it is possible to lazily provide config-time dependencies.
  2. Order matters in definitions. If service A depends on B but A is defined after B in your module, DI wil fail. This is because the lazyAngular proxy executes definitions immediately, unlike real Angular that makes sure dependencies are resolved before executing the definitions.

8 Comments

Interesting implementation but it does not really answer my question on lazy loading of "angular.module", unless I am missing something. None of your expenses-view.js' dependencies are coded using "angular.module". But I will keep this in mind for what I am trying to do.
I copied your code in bootstrap.js, more specifically everything related to makeLazyModule and lazyAngular.module and it actually works. Now, if I only understood why it is working...
Took me a while but I think I finally got it. You created a proxy version of angular.module that calls the cached $provider during ng-app.config for lazy loaded modules. Brilliant!!!
@marcoseu Hi, thanks for the kudos; please take a look at the drawbacks of my solution, added to the answer!
@"Nikos Paraskevopoulos" yes, I did realize the drawback you mention and working on solving the point 2. Config is going to be tricky...
|
1

It looks like the Node.js module ocLazyLoad defines a way of doing this lazy-loading, though I'm not sure how it fares, performance-wise, compared to the methods in the other answers or hard-coding the dependencies. Any info on this would be appreciated. One interesting thing is that the other answers need RequireJS to operate, while ocLazyLoad doesn't.

It looks like ocLazyLoad defines another provider that injects the dependency after the containing module has already been instantiated. It seems to do this by essentially replicating some low-level Angular behavior, like module loading and providing, hence why it looks so complicated. It looks like it adds just about every core Angular module as a dependency: $compileProvider, $q, $injector, ng, and so many more.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.