Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other.

Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Join the Stack Overflow community to:
  1. Ask programming questions
  2. Answer and help your peers
  3. Get recognized for your expertise

Block syntax in Objective C (and indeed C, I presume) is notoriously incongruous. Passing blocks as arguments looks different than declaring blocks as ivars, which looks different than typedefing blocks.

Is there a comprehensive list of block-declaration syntax that I could keep on hand for quick reference?

share|improve this question
7  
What's wrong with "Declaring and Creating Blocks" in the Blocks Programming Topics Guide? – Josh Caswell Feb 8 '12 at 21:27
    
straightforward explanation of using block properties: stackoverflow.com/a/20760583/294884 – Joe Blow Apr 25 '15 at 8:27
up vote 621 down vote accepted

List of Block Declaration Syntaxes

Throughout, let

  • return_type be the type of object/primitive/etc. you'd like to return (commonly void)
  • blockName be the variable name of the block you're creating
  • var_type be the type object/primitive/etc. you'd like to pass as an argument (leave blank for no parameters)
  • varName be the variable name of the given parameter

And remember that you can create as many parameters as you'd like.

Blocks as Variables

Possibly the most common for of declaration.

return_type (^blockName)(var_type) = ^return_type (var_type varName)
{
    // ...
};

Blocks as Properties

Much like declaring blocks as variables, however subtly different.

@property (copy) return_type (^blockName) (var_type);

Blocks as Parameters

Note that this is distinct from "Blocks as Arguments"; in this instance, you're declaring a method that wants a block argument.

- (void)yourMethod:(return_type (^)(var_type))blockName;

Blocks as Arguments

Note that this is distinct from "Blocks as Parameters"; in this instance, you're calling a method that wants a block argument with an anonymous block. If you have already declared a block variable, it is sufficient to pass the variable name as the argument.

[someObject doSomethingWithBlock: ^return_type (var_type varName)
{
    //...
}];

Anonymous Block

This is functionally an anonymous block, however the syntax for assigning blocks to variables is simply to set the variable equal to an anonymous block.

^return_type (var_type varName)
{
    //...
};

typedef Block

This allows you to set up a short name that can be referenced just like any other class name during the declaration of blocks.

typedef return_type (^blockName)(var_type);

To then later use blockName instead of the standard block declaration syntax, simply substitute.

Inline Block

This is arguably a less useful utilization of blocks, but may have its place nonetheless. An inline block is an anonymous block called immediately after instantiation.

^return_type (var_type varName)
{
    //...
}(var);

Inline blocks are primarily useful for scope offsetting, and are roughly equivalent to simple brace-delimited chunks of code.

{
   //...
}

Recursive Blocks

This allows you to call a block from itself, creating a loop that can be used during callbacks and GCD calls. This instantiation method is free of retain cycles in ARC.

__block return_type (^blockName)(var_type) = [^return_type (var_type varName)
{
    if (returnCondition)
    {
        blockName = nil;
        return;
    }

    // ...
} copy];
blockName(varValue);

Returning Blocks

A method can return a block,

- (return_type(^)(var_type))methodName
{
    // ...
}

as can a function, if a bit strangely.

return_type (^FunctionName())(var_type)
{
    // ...
}

Addendums

If I've missed anything, please let me know in comments, and I'll research/add them.

Oh, and in Swift...

blockName = (varName: var_type) -> (return_type)

It's almost like it's a language feature.

share|improve this answer
1  
@pcperini A great list! And how to use typedef'd block definition in variable declaration (1st item in your list)? Logical BlockType ^blockVar = Anonymous Block shows syntax error, without ^ too :( – esp May 20 '13 at 14:49
12  
Somehow my brain is incapable of remembering all these various syntax for block declarations. I probably look at this answer once a week. Wish I could give you 10 upvotes for this. – einsteinx2 May 28 '13 at 1:12
31  
We need a StackOverflow Hall of Fame for answers like this. – bejonbee Jul 25 '13 at 22:26
1  
I've converted this into Markdown for use with a viewer for printing. Handy! gist.github.com/swizzlr/6268955 – Swizzlr Aug 19 '13 at 13:13
14  
I think I need this as a tattoo. – Isaac Overacker Nov 21 '13 at 0:21

I personally like using this website (http://fuckingblocksyntax.com). The name is easier to remember than the block syntax itself:

http://fuckingblocksyntax.com

and if you can't load URLs with bad words in them you can use this mirror: http://goshdarnblocksyntax.com

fuckingblocksyntax website

share|improve this answer
1  
Love it! +1 & Bookmarked – Martin Jan 30 '14 at 13:30
    
Awesome, thanks!!! – xarly Apr 9 '14 at 10:07
4  
Now with fewer profanities: goshdarnblocksyntax.com – piperchester Jun 11 '14 at 15:02

Typedef:

typedef void (^block)(NSString *arg);

Inline:

void (^block)(NSString *) = ^(NSString *param) {
  // do something....
};

Method:

- (void)method:(void (^)(NSString *param))handler
share|improve this answer
    
This answer shows that it's not that complicated after all... just 3 different syntaxes to mix and match. – Joseph Chen Feb 7 '14 at 1:57
3  
The accepted answer is just a copy of this answer with unnecessary bloat. – Erik Aigner Feb 7 '14 at 18:18

The Xcode 4 snippet library contains templates for block typedefs and inline blocks as variables. They are also available via auto-completion (typedefblock and inlineblock).

For blocks as arguments to methods, I'd recommend declaring a typedef and then simply using that. It makes the code much easier to read.

share|improve this answer

I wrote a completionBlock for a class which will return the values of a dice after they have been shaked:

  1. Define typedef with returnType (.h above @interface declaration)

    typedef void (^CompleteDiceRolling)(NSInteger diceValue);
    
  2. Define a @property for the block (.h)

    @property (copy, nonatomic) CompleteDiceRolling completeDiceRolling;
    
  3. Define a method with finishBlock (.h)

    - (void)getDiceValueAfterSpin:(void (^)(NSInteger diceValue))finishBlock;
    
  4. Insert previous defined method in .m file and commit finishBlock to @property defined before

    - (void)getDiceValueAfterSpin:(void (^)(NSInteger diceValue))finishBlock{
        self.completeDiceRolling = finishBlock;
    }
    
  5. To trigger completionBlock pass predefined variableType to it (Don't forget to check whether the completionBlock exists)

    if( self.completeDiceRolling ){
        self.completeDiceRolling(self.dieValue);
    }
    
share|improve this answer

If you need to work back in Xcode 4.2, you can also @synthesize a block declared as a property just like you would with a non block property. Don't let the block syntax throw you.

If your block property is this:

@property (copy) return_type (^blockName) (var_type);

Then your @synthesize is this:

@property blockName;

Cheers.

share|improve this answer
typedef void (^OkBtnBlock)(id data);
typedef void (^CancelBtnBlock)();

@property (nonatomic, strong) OkBtnBlock okBtnBlock;
@property (nonatomic, strong) CancelBtnBlock cancelBtnBlock;

+ (void)foo:(OkBtnBlock)okBtn andCancel:(CancelBtnBlock)btnCancel;
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.