The specific-language tag has no usage guidance.
8
votes
2answers
50 views
What is the take on getting older (possibly obsolete) languages reviewed?
Specifically, I want to address languages from the era of 8-bit home computing. Such languages could include:
6502 Assembly
6800 Assembly
8080 Assembly
Commodore BASIC
etc...
These languages are ...
15
votes
2answers
170 views
Nothing to review
This question claims to implement the Nothing language.
I'm citing the language specification (emphasis mine):
Note: if the output does not meet the expectation of a "hello world"-program, this ...
3
votes
1answer
42 views
Python 2.7 wiki
Related to this meta.
The Python 2.7 wiki states (emphasis mine):
Use this tag if you are specifically using Python 2.7. Such questions should be tagged with [python] as well.
Why? The tagging ...
-1
votes
4answers
151 views
Is it time for the [python] to become extinct?
Every time a post involves Python code, it has the Python tag AND the Python version tag that suits the version of Python that the post is using.
I think that is a little repetitive, and we should ...
19
votes
5answers
545 views
Is [lolcode] reviewable?
Down with FizzBuzz created a lolcode tag.
Some (cough) brainfuck (cough) are even further down the esoteric alley.
Given our current site rules, I'd tend to agree.
I don't think allowing ...
3
votes
2answers
42 views
Should we tag Swift questions with the appropriate OS tag as well?
Like should we tag swift questions with the ios or the osx tag as well, or will Apple call their new OS's something else?
15
votes
4answers
207 views
The [java-8] tag, here to stay?
Recently the java-8 tag was created to apply to Java8 specific questions.
There is no doubt that the questions are, in fact, Java8 questions. The meta question though, is:
Should java-8 exist, ...
