current community

your communities

more stack exchange communities

company blog
Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges
tour help
Join the Stack Overflow Community
Stack Overflow is a community of 6.4 million programmers, just like you, helping each other.
Join them; it only takes a minute:
Sign up
up vote 41 down vote favorite
12

I have an ASP.net MVC controller called Designs that has an action with the following signature:

public ActionResult Multiple(int[] ids)

However, when I try to navigate to this action using the url:

http://localhost:54119/Designs/Multiple?ids=24041,24117

The ids parameter is always null. Is there any way to get MVC to convert the ?ids= URL query parameter into an array for the action? I've seen talk of using an action filter but as far as I can tell that will only work for POSTs where the array is passed in the request data rather than in the URL itself.

share|improve this question
up vote 86 down vote accepted

The default model binder expects this url:

http://localhost:54119/Designs/Multiple?ids=24041&ids=24117

in order to successfully bind to:

public ActionResult Multiple(int[] ids)
{
    ...
}

And if you want this to work with comma separated values you could write a custom model binder:

public class IntArrayModelBinder : DefaultModelBinder
{
    public override object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
    {
        var value = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName);
        if (value == null || string.IsNullOrEmpty(value.AttemptedValue))
        {
            return null;
        }

        return value
            .AttemptedValue
            .Split(',')
            .Select(int.Parse)
            .ToArray();
    }
}

and then you could apply this model binder to a particular action argument:

public ActionResult Multiple([ModelBinder(typeof(IntArrayModelBinder))] int[] ids)
{
    ...
}

or apply it globally to all integer array parameters in your Application_Start in Global.asax:

ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(int[]), new IntArrayModelBinder());

and now your controller action might look like this:

public ActionResult Multiple(int[] ids)
{
    ...
}
share|improve this answer
up vote 4 down vote

You can also use this URL format, and ASP.NET MVC will do everything for you. But, remember to apply URL encoding.

?param1[0]=3344&param1[1]=2222
share|improve this answer
up vote 3 down vote

To extend on Darin Dimitrov's answer, something you can get away with is accepting a simple string in your URL parameter and converting it to an array yourself:

public ActionResult Multiple(string ids){
  int[] idsArray = ids.Split(',').Select(int.Parse).ToArray();
  /* ...process results... */
}

If you get a parse error while doing this (because someone passed you a malformed array), you can cause your exception handler to return a 400 Bad Request error instead of the default, more unfriendly 404 Not Found error that MVC returns when an endpoint is not found.

share|improve this answer
up vote 2 down vote

I don't know where Groky's URL string was coming from, but I had the same problem with some javascript calling my controller/action. It would build up a URL of null, 1, or many "IDs" from a multiple-select list (which is unique to the solution I'm going to share).

I copy/pasted Darin's custom model binder and decorated my action/parameter, but it didn't work. I still got null valued int[] ids. Even in the "safe" case where I actually did have many IDs.

I ended up changing the javascript to produce an ASP.NET MVC friendly parameter array like

?ids=1&ids=2

I had to do some silly stuff, though

ids || []                 #=> if null, get an empty array
[ids || []]               #=> if a single item, wrap it in an array
[].concat.apply([], ...)  #=> in case I wrapped an array, flatten it

So, the full block was

ids = [].concat.apply([], [ids || []])
id_parameter = 'ids=' + ids.join('&ids=')

It's messy, but it's the first time I had to hack like this in javascript.

share|improve this answer
    
Just curious if there's a missing 'not' before "first time" in that last sentence. Otherwise, lucky you! – DCShannon Mar 24 '15 at 0:40
    
@DCShannon: haha, I see your point! But, this was my first time. I'm not sure if this kind of thing is normal or if I'm going overboard. – Anthony Mastrean Mar 25 '15 at 13:31

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.