Since Qt still does not support to set timeouts on QNetworkRequest objects, I wrote this little wrapper class:

/**
Usage:
new QReplyTimeout(yourReply, msec);

When the timeout is reached the given reply is closed if still running
*/
class QReplyTimeout : public QObject {
  Q_OBJECT
public:
  QReplyTimeout(QNetworkReply* reply, const int timeout) : QObject(reply) {
    Q_ASSERT(reply);
    if (reply) {
      QTimer::singleShot(timeout, this, SLOT(timeout()));
    }
  }

private slots:
  void timeout() {
    QNetworkReply* reply = static_cast<QNetworkReply*>(parent());
    if (reply->isRunning()) {
      reply->close();
    }
  }
};

You can use it in a very simple fire-and-forget manner:

QNetworkAccessManager networkAccessManger;
QNetworkReply* reply = networkAccessManger.get(QNetworkRequest(QUrl("https://www.google.com")));
new QReplyTimeout(r, 100);

If the call to Google does not finish in 100ms, it is aborted. And since the QReplyTimeout class is parented to the QNetworkReply, it will be destroyed automatically.

Review the code for any pitfalls, memory leaks, invalid casts and if it's generally in a good style.

share|improve this question
    
class is quick and concise. I see no problems there. – user23573 Oct 5 '15 at 11:13

Here are my thoughts:

  1. It's a simple class that allocates quite a few times on the heap. You could minimize the number of implicit allocations it does. The QTimer::singleShot creates a temporary QObject instance and allocates a bunch on the heap. You can avoid it by handling a single-shot timer explicitly using timerEvent. You also avoid the need to set up any connections that way. A QObject does about two allocations when the first connection is added to it.

  2. Use Qt-5 style connections, but that doesn't apply anymore in light of #1 above.

  3. Add a static helper method that uses this class to set a timeout on a network request. The fact that you need to allocate ReplyTimeout is an implementation detail of sorts that could be abstracted out that way.

  4. Check if the reply is running before you set a timeout on it. Perhaps it was an incorrect/impossible request at the moment it was submitted to the manager and it was immediately finished.

  5. You're not supposed to name your classes with a Q prefix. It's reserved for Qt.

The below is portable across Qt 4 and Qt 5.

class ReplyTimeout : public QObject {
  Q_OBJECT
  QBasicTimer m_timer;
public:
  QReplyTimeout(QNetworkReply* reply, const int timeout) : QObject(reply) {
    Q_ASSERT(reply);
    if (reply && reply->isRunning())
      m_timer.start(timeout, this);
  }
  static void set(QNetworkReply* reply, const int timeout) {
    new ReplyTimeout(reply, timeout);
  }
protected:
  void timerEvent(QTimerEvent * ev) {
    if (!m_timer.isActive() || ev->timerId() != m_timer.timerId())
      return;
    auto reply = static_cast<QNetworkReply*>(parent());
    if (reply->isRunning())
      reply->close();
    m_timer.stop();
  }
};

Use:

QNetworkAccessManager networkAccessManger;
QNetworkReply* reply = 
  networkAccessManger.get(QNetworkRequest(QUrl("https://www.google.com")));
ReplyTimeout::set(reply, 100);
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.