-
Updated
Mar 26, 2020 - Python
fine-tuning
Here are 100 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Apr 3, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2020 - MATLAB
-
Updated
Apr 1, 2019 - Python
Describe the bug
When using the LMFineTuner and specifying the learning_rate_finder_configs , an error is thrown when passing these configs to finetuner.find_learning_rate() as suggested in the documentation and in the [Colab example](https://colab.research.google.com/github/Novetta/adaptnlp/blob/master/tutor
It might be nice to, as a final step, show an instance of an actual inference on the model so a reader can "tie it all together". It isn't strictly useful, but for anyone who doesn't know a lot of the terminology it would bring it home.
-
Updated
May 19, 2020 - CSS
-
Updated
Oct 10, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 3, 2018 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
May 20, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 20, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Mar 3, 2019 - Python
"It turn out that Tucker decomposition yields lower accuracy loss than CP decomposition in my experiments, so the results below are all from Tucker decomposition."
what means "Tucker decomposition yields lower accuracy loss than CP decomposition" ?
and can the project be used in other cnn models?
-
Updated
Apr 24, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Oct 21, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 7, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Dec 18, 2018 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Mar 31, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Mar 19, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 9, 2019 - HTML
-
Updated
Nov 14, 2019 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Oct 25, 2017 - Python
-
Updated
May 16, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Jan 22, 2020
-
Updated
Aug 12, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 29, 2017
-
Updated
Aug 2, 2019 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Oct 19, 2017 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the fine-tuning topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the fine-tuning topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
I have trained almost 80thousand examples within 2000 labels,valid acc almost 92%,but test result all example prob is blew 0.01.
I have tried tranning examples to predict.