sha1
Here are 341 public repositories matching this topic...
Preface: I am not an expert in encryption, so sorry for any inaccuracies with how I am describing the issue here.
In the documentation, it states:
// Note: CBC and ECB modes use PKCS#7 padding as default
Is it possible to configure what padding is used? I am working with a system where they are not expecting padding. Is that something that even makes sense/is possible?
it got updated to use only use TLS 1.3, but currently mozilla-modern.badssl.com only use tls 1.2 so it clearly not set to current version of 'modern' configuration. so it need to updated.
actually, it looks like pushed though a level down ( old modern-> intermediate, old intermediate -> now old )
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS#Modern_compatibility
-
Updated
Jan 18, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
May 9, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 17, 2019 - C++
-
Updated
Aug 1, 2019 - Java
Related to a suggestion for better cryptographic timestamping of Git repos & other things, git-evtag was proposed as a solution to the weak SHA-1 hashes Git uses. I wanted to try it out to see whether it could be easily used with the timestamping as a post-commit hook, but I can't
-
Updated
Oct 6, 2018 - Lua
-
Updated
Jun 28, 2018 - Objective-C
By the trick to link with the C stub or the pure OCaml implementation, ocamlbuild can not make a documentation.
-
Updated
Jun 28, 2019 - C
-
Updated
Sep 5, 2019 - C
-
Updated
Jul 16, 2018 - Java
-
Updated
May 11, 2020 - Lua
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the sha1 topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the sha1 topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
It doesn't seem intuitive to me that Aes is a stateless object. You can create an instance of it with a BlockMode, which seems to imply to me that several encrypt/decrypt of the same data would produce different results each time.
If Aes is going to remain stateless, it would be nice to be explicity about this in the docs.