Type of issue: (feature suggestion, bug?)

Suggestion

Chapter:

no-chapter

Why use .jsx instead of .js? It's not a best practice: facebook/create-react-app#87 (comment)

On Windows10 machine, following README installation instructions:

c:\code\mean>npm start

[email protected] start c:\code\mean
concurrently -c "yellow.bold,green.bold" -n "SERVER,BUILD" "nodemon server" "ng build --watch"

[SERVER] [nodemon] 1.18.9
[SERVER] [nodemon] to restart at any time, enter rs
[SERVER] [nodemon] watching: .
[SERVER] [nodemon] starting node server
[SERVER] ../.

A pleasure that LinkedHashMap has been added.

While I have a different point about the iterative sequence. The sequence should order by the key last time put in instead of the first time put in.

This situation is caused by the func named LinkedHashMap.Put:

// Put inserts key-value pair into the map.
// Key should adhere to the comparator's type assertion, otherwise method panics.
fu

CSS has the ability to allow proportional margin and padding:
https://webplatform.github.io/docs/guides/the_css_layout_model/#Proportional-margins-and-padding-in-the-W3C-box-model

I was wondering if it is possible to implement a similar concept with edges. For example, if I wanted my top margin of a subview to its superview to be 20% of the superview height (i.e. subview.top = superview.top +

It would be nice to have a healthcheck without writing YAML file.
I'm starting minio service, and it has 2 routes k8s style Liveness and Readiness. More here https://docs.min.io/docs/minio-monitoring-guide.html

Is it make any sense to implement such a feature?

Eg: Suppose there is an activity stack of A -> B -> C -> D. If we launch activity B again with the launch mode as “singleTask”.
should be updated to
Eg: Suppose there is an activity stack of A -> B -> C -> D. If we launch activity D again with the launch mode as “singleInstance”.

Repro: go .cabal file, type quick somewhere in build-depends stanza, a suggestion list appears
Expected: the QuickCheck package is present in the suggestions' list
Instead: the QuickCheck package is absent in the suggestions' list

Hello.

Right now if I do something like:

ENUM: test_t
    { FOO 10 }
    { BAR 20 }
;

then I get singleton classes FOO and BAR in the Browser. When I click on them, I get the definition of them, which is: SINGLETON: FOO, and SINGLETON: BAR. This is not really useful. I am expecting to get 10 for FOO, and 20 for BAR.

Is there a way to get the value of

If I understand it right, check_instances seems to tend to cluster transformers with same types without regard to the list order.
So the results from make_group and BaseEnsemble are also wrong.

Reproduce - Case 1

Code

from mlens.utils import check_instances
from sklearn.preprocessing import (
    StandardScaler as SS, FunctionTransformer as FT)
from xgboost imp

There's a test that specifically tests for function signatures on the next line. There's a comment that states that this test passes. In reality, it clearly doesn't:

The cursor is on myFunction1. Scope hunter clearly shows that the function name is not in the

http://www.pcg-random.org/
See branch pcg

First without inlining 6% slower, now with inlining regained the 6% (5a397989846c54d6f3af072be47d3666d331838f)
pcg quality is better, but only 64bit.

http://xoroshiro.di.unimi.it/xoroshiro128plus.c is broken.

Um, I've just cloned and built this library and I can see there is a doc directory and that it contains html pages but that these are not installed outside of the source tree. I am intending to use this for a INI config file reader/writer provided by the Extension API on a Raspberry Pi (for a Home Automation Project) that I am SSHing into and I'm not using a GUI so I'd be looking to use `m

This is similar to #456 and #454, but the solution will be somewhat different, since we actually already know within the taffybar process when this update needs to be handled. A little bit of thinking about how communication between these two components probably needs to be done, but this should not be too hard to figure out.

RFX Stack is great, thanks for taking the time to work on it and share.

My main issue right now is obscure debugging in development mode - when jumping to error line numbers in Chrome from the console I'm usually confronted with things like this:

eval("'use strict';\n\nObject.defineProperty(exports, \"__esModule\", {\n  value: true\n});\n\nvar 

Making it quite difficu