Skip to content
#

lint

Here are 737 public repositories matching this topic...

stylelint
bkdotcom
bkdotcom commented Mar 4, 2020

Clearly describe the bug

"false-positive" no-descending-specificity with "empty" definitions (see below)

Which rule, if any, is the bug related to?

no-descending-specificity

What code is needed to reproduce the bug?

    nav {
      display: inline-block;
      a {
        display: inline-block;
      }
    }

    a,
    button,
    label {
      &:focus,
onrige
onrige commented Nov 21, 2019

Hey. Just a question. Can we add possibility to extend from single string not just from array? So it will work like other linting libraries (eslint, stylelint, etc.).

package.json

"babel":  {
  "extends": "shared-tools"
},
"commitlint": {
  "extends": [
    "shared-tools"
  ]
},
"eslintConfig": {
  "extends": "shared-tools"
}
binkley
binkley commented Nov 14, 2019

I'd like to use ktlint's jar for a Kotlin program to format source code strings (my program accepts runtime Kotlin source via JSR223). I wasn't able to find documentation, or an example.

Can you direct me?

briankhsieh
briankhsieh commented Jul 22, 2019

Hi Coala maintainers,

Can you help clarify AGPL coverage in Coala's case? Specifically, are the modifications made by Coala, which would get put into the input source code, covered by AGPL?

Your clarification will help evaluate the technology selection. I'd be helpful If you could clarify your interpretation in the Q&A page.

Thanks,

Brian

azu
azu commented Nov 1, 2019

Current

export declare type TextlintRuleReportHandler = {
    [P in ASTNodeTypes]?: (node: TypeofTxtNode<P>) => void | Promise<any>;
} & {
    [index: string]: (node: any) => void | Promise<any>;
};
/**
 * Textlint rule reporter function
 */
export declare type TextlintRuleReporter<T extends object = {}> = (context: Readonly<TextlintRuleContext>, options?: TextlintRuleOptions<T>) 
duaraghav8
duaraghav8 commented Sep 15, 2019

This is just an initial though, anyone is welcome to participate in this thread. Only once the format is finalised will I add this to Milestone.

Description
A user shouldn't have to head to the docs to view a list of rules (along with detailed description, parameters supplied, autofix availability). The CLI should allow this.

Use case
Much faster & more convenient for user because

dgollahon
dgollahon commented Feb 22, 2019

When using include_examples a new RSpec context is not created, unlike with it_behaves_like. It is a common mistake to write something like:

include_examples 'my thing' do
  let(:a) { 'a')
end

include_examples 'my thing' do
  let(:a) { 'b')
end

And the author of the test might not realize that a will be defined as 'b' in both cases. (NOTE: I'm writing this sa

cop

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the lint topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the lint topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more

You can’t perform that action at this time.