-
Updated
Jan 18, 2020 - Python
sha512
Here are 158 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
May 9, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 25, 2020 - C#
To check that all newtypes (SecretKeys, Poly1305, etc.) implement the correct traits, new testing functions are needed.
For example fn test_traits_secret_key<Secret: Debug + Drop + PartialEq>() {} could be used to check that a secret key implements the needed traits.
By the trick to link with the C stub or the pure OCaml implementation, ocamlbuild can not make a documentation.
-
Updated
May 11, 2020 - Lua
-
Updated
Apr 9, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
May 12, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 7, 2017 - Python
Translation: Svenska
I need help with translation.
https://osbvnmv.oneskyapp.com/collaboration/project?id=353871
-
Updated
Sep 20, 2019 - Swift
-
Updated
Feb 7, 2018 - Swift
-
Updated
May 28, 2019 - Rust
-
Updated
Dec 14, 2019 - Rust
-
Updated
Dec 28, 2019 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the sha512 topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the sha512 topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
One nice property of both compilation outputs (both the
secp256k1build and thehashesbuild) is that their algorithms are supposed to be deterministic. So as long as we're fully testing both, consumers can be reasonably-sure that I haven't poisoned them. Probably the most important example: all produced signatures are themselves deterministic (both Schnorr and ECDSA signatures) so we can [r