As part of clarifying what is part of the open source offering and what is examples or private code, we should signal these differences using package names/namespaces.

Suggested solution:

• Let all public, published packages retain their @backstage namespace.
• Change all private packages in the open source project (plugins/home-page, plugins/welcome) to be under an @internal names

Floating numbers should have thousand separator with specifier 'n' like python.

Python:

>>> from locale import setlocale, LC_ALL
>>> setlocale(LC_ALL, 'en_US')
'en_US'
>>> '{:n}'.format(1234)
'1,234'
>>> '{:n}'.format(1234.56)
'1,234.56'

C++

setlocale(LC_ALL, "en-US");
fmt::format("{:n} {:n}", 1234, 1234.56);
// gives 1,234 1234.56

Nakamoto Satoshi does not clearly explain about this result. I think we should create an appendix to step-by-step explain about this paper' s calculation

Thanks

感谢您对DeepLearn-500-questions的支持，让我能拿到google的offer，随机抽取数位给过我赞的人发送红包，请扫码进入群聊找我领(QQ邮箱请点击显示图片)
发件人：[email protected]

虽然可能不是作者发的，但这样实在过分。提醒大家里面的二维码是红包码，这个作用都知道，但我挂出来就是为了防止更多人被欺骗。

Updated

OK，可以基本确定不是仓库 Owner 所为。而且有人用脚本监控了 Star 的用户的邮箱，并使用了随机的 163 邮箱。追查可能不太现实，大家不要相信即可。

Hi, I doubt that data_utils.get_num_dialog_examples() returns correct number.

In dstc8_single_domain & train, data_utils.get_num_dialog_examples() returns 82588, but the number of examples in dstc8_single_domain_train_examples.tf_record is 41294. I think these two numbers should be the same. Is it right? (The former is around as double as the latter because get_num_dialog_examples() counts USE

Extracted from iterative/dvc#3608 (comment)

To match docs, where options have been ordered manually from more to less important (at least that's the idea).

Example difference:

λ dvc commit -h
usage: dvc commit [-h] [-q | -v] [-f] [-d] [-R] [targets [targets ...]]
...

optional arguments:
  -h, --help            show this help message and