For the sake of simplicity we are assuming the write-buffer alignment to be 4096kB, and the read-buffer alignment to be 512b. Those are likely good across the majority of systems, but some disks do not support 512b access.

Linux will tell us on sysfs what is the preferred alignment. We should use that.

Describe the bug
When I pull the resize button of the code editor, it doesn't the resize the code in the editor.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Click the resize button on the code editor and drag it down
2. The code doesn't resize

Expected behavior
I expected the code to resize as I drag down the button.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to

Will break out a separate bug for array_slice.

Originally posted by @cdleary in google/xls#72 (comment)

(e.g. for links and images), because some of these examples are now being rendered in the docs.

Added by @fchollet in requests for contributions.

Its not a issue but its a feedback , Include one line code to deal with streaming http response