-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020 - OCaml
Code quality
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
Here are 448 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Oct 12, 2020 - Rust
-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020 - Java
-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020 - OCaml
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - JavaScript
Affects PMD Version:
6.17
Rule:
All rulesets.
Description:
PMD output does not inform the user as to the number of rules contravened while running the tool. The user has to look at the output file.
Code Sample demonstrating the issue:
Sep 01, 2019 9:42:45 AM net.sourceforge.pmd.cache.FileAnalysisCache loadFromFile
INFO: Analysis cache loaded
Sep 01, 2019 9:
-
Updated
Oct 13, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020 - Go
-
Updated
Oct 12, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 7, 2020 - Ruby
-
Updated
Sep 13, 2020 - TypeScript
Currently PiranhaSwift APIs are specified using a properties file as shown here. It will be helpful to migrate this to use a json file so that more properties can be specified easily. For instance, it could be an array of methodProperties where the methodName, flagType, returnType and argumentIndex of the flag are s
Rule request
Thesis
There might be some crazy examples of mutation, when assigning to a slice:
my_list = [1, 2, 3]
my_list[0:3] = [0, 0, 0]So, let's ban this.
However, we still allow regular index assignments:
my_list = [1, 2,-
Updated
Oct 12, 2020
-
Updated
Oct 10, 2020 - JavaScript
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Haskell
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - Dockerfile
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
May 19, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
Oct 9, 2020 - PHP
There is a gap in the docs about managing your installation using github settings and imgbot settings
Main points:
For managing your imgbot installation check out github's docs.
They offer 2 options for managing this. You can select which repositories you want it installed in, or you can choose "all repositories including all future repositories".
You can log in and see your repos and req
let x = { default: 42}; // "default" is highlighted as keyword
-
Updated
Jun 25, 2019 - Vim script
-
Updated
Oct 13, 2020 - Ruby
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Python
Code quality apps
Datree
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
DeepScan
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
LGTM
Find and prevent zero-days and other critical bugs, with customizable alerts and automated code review
CodeScene
A quality visualization tool to identify and prioritize technical debt and evaluate your organizational efficiency
TestQuality
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Coveralls
Ensure that new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Works with any CI service
Code Inspector
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
DeepSource
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis
Codacy
Automated code reviews to help developers ship better software, faster
Imgbot
A GitHub app that optimizes your images
Restyled.io
Restyle Pull Requests as they're opened
Sider
Automatically analyze pull request against custom per-project rulesets and best practices
Better Code Hub
A Benchmarked Definition of Done for Code Quality with BetterCodeHub
CommitCheck
CommitCheck ensures your commit messages are consistent and contain all required information
codebeat
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive