Code review is systematic examination (sometimes referred to as peer review) of computer source code. It is intended to find mistakes overlooked in software development, improving the overall quality of software. Reviews are done in various forms such as pair programming, informal walkthroughs, and formal inspections.
Especially in the light of #151 , it would be great if people could just re-generate the whole Id file.
It would be nice if diff-goto-source (C-c C-c) worked when this is invoked from github-review-forge-pr-at-point. All it needs to do is set the current directory to the git working tree in the diff-mode buffer. In many cases it does not matter too much whether the user has the "correct" branch is checked out - it just needs to be close.
Find accessibility issues in your pull requests
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis
Ensure that new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Works with any CI service
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
Pull Assistant analyses pull requests and provides the optimal way to perform code reviews
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
A Benchmarked Definition of Done for Code Quality with BetterCodeHub
DO NOT MERGE – as a service
Pull requests automation service. Merge your pull requests faster
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request
Automated code review for technical debt and test coverage
Automated code reviews to help developers ship better software, faster
CommitCheck ensures your commit messages are consistent and contain all required information
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
Similar to microsoft/vscode-pull-request-github#1622, have the same behavior for the queries in the PR tree