Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Asyncheck #223

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
from
Open

Asyncheck #223

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

@dpineiden
Copy link

@dpineiden dpineiden commented Aug 20, 2020

Reason for the change
The new versions of Python3 require use 'drain' after write. Some syntaxis corrections. Some better algorithms.

Description
Dropped the 'loop' parameter where is deprecated. After write, use 'drain'. A reader in an async loop. Use async/await pair. The modern statements
Some better asyncio exception (have some more to consider)

Code examples
On documentation:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-stream.html#asyncio.StreamWriter

Uses on the tests scripts:
https://gitlab.com/pineiden/datadbs-rethinkdb/-/tree/master/tests

Save data:

  • load data on table: load_data.py
    Read data:
    read_data.py
    simple_loop_.py scripts
    simple_test_
    ,py script

Interact with rdb:
crea_perfiles.py

Checklist

References

https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-stream.html#asyncio.StreamWriter

Using TaskLoop:
https://tasktools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Example:
https://gitlab.com/pineiden/tasktools/-/tree/master/test

Anything else related to the change e.g. documentations, RFCs, etc.

pineiden added 3 commits Aug 19, 2020
More safe on read-write actions
Read from stream use async loop
pineiden
pineiden
@dpineiden
Copy link
Author

@dpineiden dpineiden commented Aug 20, 2020

I uploaded the corrections....I have to do a new PR?

@gabor-boros
Copy link
Member

@gabor-boros gabor-boros commented Aug 26, 2020

Hm, it is weird that unit test are not reported... I'll need to take a look on it.

BTW, the tests are failing for the change: https://travis-ci.org/github/rethinkdb/rethinkdb-python/builds/721071084

pineiden added 2 commits Aug 26, 2020
@dpineiden
Copy link
Author

@dpineiden dpineiden commented Aug 26, 2020

Now.

This:
this_task = asyncio.current_task()

In py3.8 exists the method 'current_task' for asyncio.

And """ error is for a docstring.

I think is all for now...

pineiden
@dpineiden
Copy link
Author

@dpineiden dpineiden commented Aug 26, 2020

I think this last 5 lines must be discussed with more people.

On net.py says 'many arguments', how we replace that? I use **kwargs and inside get the values that I need, but is a tricky way to be more flexible. (lines 612, 753)

On net_asyncio.py, current_task() is a method that exists since python3.8 so...

And the """ is for a docstrings :S

I can change 'db' to 'db_name', is not a problem.

pineiden added 4 commits Aug 26, 2020
Copy link
Member

@gabor-boros gabor-boros commented Sep 6, 2020 — with Codacy Production

Codacy Here is an overview of what got changed by this pull request:

Issues
======
+ Solved 30
- Added 5
           

Complexity increasing per file
==============================
- rethinkdb/asyncio_net/net_asyncio.py  1
         

Clones removed
==============
+ rethinkdb/net.py  -1
         

See the complete overview on Codacy

pineiden
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.