As discussed in #3926, the following files do not have .py extensions because TensorFlow does not yet support the current Python.

• dynamic_programming/k_means_clustering_tensorflow.py_tf
• machine_learning/lstm/lstm_prediction.py_tf
• neural_network/gan.py_tf
• neural_network/input_data.py_tf

TODO: Restore the .py file extensions

• The issue is present in the latest release.
• I have searched the [issues](https://github.com/mui

Proof read transcribed code of UPDATE_PROGRAM against scans

Lines: 548
Page: 1386—1396 (10)

Reduced quality scans can be found here

It is currently expected that UIs will figure out when to hide msg_history_show messages by themselves.

I think this is bad for two reasons:

• It makes UIs less similar, increasing the number of things to learn when going from one UI to another.
• It makes UIs different from the TUI, which offers a press ENTER prompt when the time to hide msg_history_show messages has come.

After [di

Summary

Usage of HttpCompressionMiddleware needs to be relfected in Scrapy stats.

Motivation

In order to estimate scrapy memory usage efficiency and prevent.. memory leaks like this.
I will need to know:

1. number of request/response objects that can be active (can be achieved by using [trackref](https://docs.scrapy.org/en/latest/topi

What happened:

1. user is on a viewPanel page
2. user clicks on top-nav "share" icon, expecting it to share the panel view
3. the generated link is for the dashboard, not the panel

What you expected to happen:
Maybe very experienced Grafana users will know that 1) the top-nav share link is always for the dashboard, even if you're on a panel view; and 2) panels have their own sha

What problem does this feature solve?

Example use case:
A static generated app with thousands of routes, like an e-commerce having a route for each product.
Apart from scheduling nuxt generate to run periodically and generate all static and dynamic routes, it would be nice to have the possibility to generate the static files for a single route, for example in a hook when the related ba

Bug report

Describe the bug

There is an extra space in the French wording in the modal to add a single unilateral relation in the CTB. But I also wonder if the wording is actually correct: for the 2 first relationship types we use "[CT1] a un [CT2]".

See video: https://www.loom.com/share/95e8b07f2dff4dc3801624dd9d6bafc4

Steps to reproduce the behavior

1. In dev env, Go to