jsx
Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.
Here are 2,751 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Feb 1, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jan 13, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Dec 18, 2020 - JavaScript
Babel Macro
It would be nice to have a babel macro that automatically runs the babel plugin to remove the runtime. That way, this project would work out of the box with "zero" config tools like create-react-app.
I'm thinking it could be something like:
import {html} from 'htm/preact/macro'This is similar conceptually to CSS-IN-JS libraries providing a macro for their tools. See https://e
I'm sorry to post an issue that is missing crucial evidence, but some debugging of a recent config loading bug makes me suspect that the react-rails railtie.rb may be modifying the load order of initializers, and preventing the values in Rails.application.config being as expected.
Whether this happens or not appears to be partly dependent on where in the Gemfile the react-rails gem is l
To reproduce:
$ npm pack styled-jsx@3.2.4
npm notice
npm notice 📦 styled-jsx@3.2.4
npm notice === Tarball Contents ===
npm notice 6.1kB dist/.DS_Store
npm notice 599B dist/_constants.js
npm notice 22.3kB dist/_utils.js
npm notice 8.2kB dist/babel-external.js
npm notice 46B babel-test.js
npm notice 753B dist/babel-test.js
npm notice 41B babel.js
npm notice 10.4k-
Updated
Nov 17, 2020 - JavaScript
Not really up to date on this. I'm much more of just throw something together in Jest/Mocha type. But I think this should not be overlooked. I'd love to see a Solid port of Testing Library. I think this is currently a gap in the narrative for Solid. I'm interested in understanding what it would take to make it happen.
-
Updated
Feb 1, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Aug 9, 2019 - JavaScript
More error logging
I think having Crank emit errors/warnings in more situations would go a long ways towards compensating for the docs' lack of nuance.
E.g., an async generator returning
undefineddoesn't strike me as a common thing to want to do, and if someone wants it maybe they should returnnullso it's explicit. Then Crank could throw an error if an async generator returnsundefined. That should
-
Updated
Feb 1, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Dec 31, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Dec 11, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Nov 6, 2019 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Feb 1, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jan 31, 2021 - Emacs Lisp
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Dec 11, 2020 - JavaScript
Blocked By: wix/vscode-glean#97
Example:
class Foo extends Component {
render() {
return (<div>
{this.props.foo.map((bar) => <div>{bar.x}</div>)}
</div>)
}
}
Current:
const Foo = props => {
const foo = useRef();
const x = useRef();
return <div>
{foo.current.map(bar => <div>{x.current}</div>)}
-
Updated
Dec 11, 2020 - JavaScript
It may be nice to ultimately just update these tests to read the data/blocks dir and run tests against each automatically so it's easier to manage these tests
-
Updated
Aug 18, 2020 - TypeScript
The documentation contains a few references to issues from the now archived yewstack/docs repository.
Since the docs repository is read-only, the same issues should be re-created here and the links in the docs should be updated to point to the new issue.
"Contribute to our docs" links