There are many reports of the test being flaky: bitcoin/bitcoin#20672 (comment)

Thus, it should be made more robust, as described in bitcoin/bitcoin#20538 (comment)

Useful skills:

• Background in our functional test suite (python3)
• Background in zmq

Want to work on this issue?

For guidance on

Just for RSA. Do encrypt and decrypt. Include a bold comment that this should not be used for bulk encryption.

It should be the current best practice (fetch), have proper error handling and resource allocation/deallocation and be in the style of a known answer test.

Welcome to JavaScript community

Describe your change:

• Add an algorithm?
• Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
• Documentation change?

Checklist:

• I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
• This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
• I know that p

Hello spoooopyyy hackers 🎃

This is a Hacktoberfest only issue! 👻

This is also data-sciency!

The Problem

Our English dictionary contains words that aren't English, and does not contain common English words.

Examples of non-common words in the dictionary:

"hlithskjalf",
  "hlorrithi",
  "hlqn",
  "hm",
  "hny",
  "ho",
  "hoactzin",
  "hoactzine

Background

When a node has multiple private channels with the same peer, the hop hints in their payment requests will be populated with multiple channels. The purpose of these hop hints is to specify the next node's key and indicate the fees and cltv delta needed for route construction.

In pathfinding, due to non-strict forwarding, an LND node paying to this destination will only use the

Currently stratumserver has no unit tests. This will improve the quality and allow future commits to be TDD safe. All units will be tested to ensure the module as a unit itself is tested.

According to the comments here: https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/blob/master/types/events.go#L14-L18, a newblock event is triggered after a block has been committed.

That being the case, I would expect the block data included with the event to have the same structure as the /block?height=xxxx RPC call.

However, the newblock event seems to be missing the block_id section.

Problem:

A common pattern is:

GUARD(s2n_stuffer_skip_write(stuffer, bytes_to_write));
uint8_t* ptr = suffer->blob.data + stuffer->write_cursor - bytes_to_write;

which could be simplified.

Solution:

*ptr could be an *out parameter to s2n_stuffer_skip_write

• Does this change what S2N sends over the wire? No.
• Does this change any public APIs? No.

Clients that support multiple server connections would like to have a way to decide which server connection is best able to handle a query. Servers currently "sort of" expose their load as fees, but there's no real exposure of server load in a useful way. Some parameter should be added to the "server" publication stream that clients can just compare across servers to decide which is most likely to

https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-feature-policy/

I guess it will be easy to add, because we certainly don't use any of these features.
Or maybe "gyroscope" or so may be used by the random number generator in sjcl, but that's all.