-
Updated
Mar 31, 2021 - Shell
pki
Here are 353 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Apr 24, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2021 - PowerShell
-
Updated
Mar 29, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2021 - Jinja
-
Updated
Jun 30, 2020 - Go
-
Updated
Mar 7, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 14, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 28, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Apr 8, 2021 - Perl
-
Updated
Apr 13, 2021
-
Updated
Mar 17, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Feb 16, 2021 - PowerShell
-
Updated
Nov 8, 2020 - C#
-
Updated
May 2, 2019 - Go
-
Updated
Oct 14, 2020 - Go
During our last meeting, we discussed how should the server/the client compute the commitment:
-
Main concern: server is using a static salt which would allow an attacker to test whether keys exist in the tree
=> client sends salt along with the registration
=> need secure PRNG -
How to ensure the server is using the right commitment scheme? Client should verify with the scheme specified
This issue was migrated from Pagure Issue #3199. Originally filed by rcritten (@rcritten) on 2020-08-03 15:59:52:
- Assigned to nobody
IPA can be installed in a CA-less configuration with the user providing the certificates required for operation. Running ipa-healthcheck with this will generate quite a few pk
CertificateImport: Remove non-mandatory parameter `Ensure` from the `Get-TargetResource` function
Details of the scenario you tried and the problem that is occurring:
In the resource CertificateImport there should be no need to have the non-mandatory parameter Ensure in the Get-TargetResource function.
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Mar 17, 2021 - C
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the pki topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the pki topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
What would you like to be added
Add support for a DynamoDB storage backend. Although MySQL is available, it would require to run a RDS Instance for it. Extra costs, backup considerations, etc. Even with Aurora Serverless.
DynamoDB is just there, scales as needed with OnDemand pricing and has fine backup capabilities.
Why this is needed
We plan to run step-ca in AWS ECS on Farga