bitwarden
Here are 120 public repositories matching this topic...
Whenever I submit a GET request to the api/public/groups endpoint, the "collections" field for each group returns "None" on every group, even if they have access to collections. I can verify that the
Describe the solution you'd like
Current op command has a get item with --fields flag which makes it a lot simpler to extract values from details or section fields.
The output function can be used with this:
{{- output "op" "get" "item" "some-id" "--fields" "some-field" }}
But it might be nicer to have a built-in onepassworditemFields function (or something)
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 11, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Apr 15, 2020 - Go
-
Updated
May 22, 2021 - C#
While was deploying this program to aws, I encountered an error as I did not setup sufficient permission. When I deploy the second time, I encountered various deploy error like
Serverless Error ---------------------------------------
An error occurred: IamRoleLambdaExecution - bitwarden-serverless-prod-us-east-1-lambdaRole already exists.
and
Serverless Error -----
-
Updated
Apr 14, 2019 - Go
-
Updated
May 25, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 9, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jan 26, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Apr 8, 2021 - Mustache
-
Updated
May 2, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 1, 2021 - Jinja
-
Updated
Jun 9, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
May 17, 2021 - HTML
-
Updated
Mar 12, 2021
-
Updated
May 8, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 6, 2021 - Shell
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the bitwarden topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the bitwarden topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Subject of the issue
When attempting to do a login to an account that has 2FA enabled, but without the 2FA details, it seems to return the wrong error response. Not just the message, but the whole object is different. I understand that this is likely not a priority considering everything works, but for parity's sake, it would be nice to have this implemented the right way.
I also noticed t