vm

Feature request

Please include the following information:

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

We're looking into optimising keyword arguments in TruffleRuby and need a way to benchmark methods without the inlining mechanism.

Describe the solution you'd like.

Looking for something we can use when running, e.g. `jt ruby --engine.ExcludeInline fo

As the complexity of the project grows, we find that often adding a change to QEMU configurations breaks something else unintended. This pretty much happens every single change and is becoming unmanageable. We need an actual test plan:

1. A set of .utm files of various operating systems, architectures, and configurations.
2. A checklist of things to test for each one (mouse, sound, network,

• Source

JsPointerToString(NULL, 0, &str);

• Expected
  str = empty string

• Actual
  failed and returns JsErrorNullArgument

I think this should be possible

This feature enables the ipsec backend for Flannel in the k3sup install command

Expected Behaviour

An additional flag to k3sup install should enable ipsec for Flannel as

Field was moved in most recent API Version.
This looks hard to patch to make backwards compatible since the structs look to have been copied from ignite directly without use of kube api-machinery:
https://github.com/weaveworks/footloose/blob/8bd6cfc/pkg/ignite/inspect.go#L43

Currently, our math module isn't completely filled with necessary math functions, where you can contribute us by adding more math functions. This issue has reference on how to add log function to the math module.

How to implement

PR #154 has example on how to add log10 to the math module, which you can use as a reference to add log (base 2) function.

Finally

And don't forget

Depends on #1048

Another Ethers issue 😄 : I lately had the use case where I wanted to pull in some tx data via RPC with Ethers which I wanted to use in some client testing context but I finally gave up since the conversion to our tx format here was not so clearly spottable and I used some direct client data extraction

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Run make all as described in README.md and follow install process.
2. After install, macOS-VM.efi.vdi and macOS-VM.vdi are located directly in ~/VirtualBox VMs instead of ~/VirtualBox VMs/macOS-VM as is typical for VirtualBox VMs.

Expected behavior
After install, macOS-VM.efi.vdi and macOS-VM.vdi should be located in `~/

Hi!
First, thanks for the guide, I enjoyed it 😃 I am wondering if there are test-images or something that extensively test if things are implemented correctly? The code I came up with does not match your example code exactly and I'd like to see if would make a difference in a hypothetical "compliance test suite".

It would be great to add the Quake 3 JIT compiler (e.g. for x86 or ARM).