Skip to content
master
Switch branches/tags
Code

Latest commit

Merge in JGCRI/gcam-core from plp/bugfix/060121 to master

* commit '64ab9a0040a16aab53a3a059f84ba54d3b92db82': (31 commits)
  Update links to slides and videos
  Add GCAMv5.1 publication to README
  Add changes that attempts to detect if Broyden is stuck in a local minimum and allows it to try to jump out if so.  Otherwise it can not becuase we only allow each step to strictly make the solution better.
  Bump version to 5.4
  One last rebuild of package data and fix some errors / warnings after CEDS update
  Remove TODO in comments now that we added SolutionInfo::getSolutionFloor
  Address comments on zchunk_L112.ceds_ghg_en_R_S_T_Y.R
  Address PR comments including initialization of params in GHGPolicy and use solution floor instead of arbitrary hard coding it in the Preconditioner.  To do this we have to make the solution floor available in SolutionInfo.
  Fix bug where fgas emissions unit only got set from some years and not all (applicable) years resulting in inconsistent units reported to the database by year
  Update zchunk_L112.ceds_ghg_en_R_S_T_Y.R
  Update initial tax guesses for 2.6 target finder files for 5.4
  Fix primary energy rewrites for traded*CCS
  Clean up a couple more precursor warnings
  Some fixes to primary energy and food demand queries
  Take case of deprecation warning about `group_by` / `add`
  Update the compiled .jar files and the modelinterface submodule to reflect the bugfix changes
  Some solution changes that got lost in the shuffle which were meant to be in with the last set of solution fixes (the CMP even describes that it is!).  The only change of consequence is to set the scale of demands to 1 if the market is solved below the solution floor so that Broyden doesn't waste iterations on such markets.  In theory this should help with variability in solution performance with parallel turned on.
  Fix bug with negative emissions budget + linked policies + constraint which was causing GHG constraints to have poor solution behavior
  Fix GHGPolicy so that taxes and constraints do not use the sentinal value -1 to indicate not set and use the Value class in this case.
  Update electricity cost files / calculations to ensure that all technologies receive a variable O&M cost input (even if it is zero).  This adds an OM-var cost for CSP & CSP_storage, which will (modestly) impact results.
  ...
aa652d0

Git stats

Files

Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.

Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM)

The Joint Global Change Research Institute (JGCRI) is the home and primary development institution for GCAM, an integrated assessment tool for exploring consequences and responses to global change. Climate change is a global issue that impacts all regions of the world and all sectors of the global economy. Thus, any responses to the threat of climate change, such as policies or international agreements to limit greenhouse gas emissions, can have wide ranging consequences throughout the energy system as well as on land use and land cover. Integrated assessment models endeavor to represent all world regions and all sectors of the economy in an economic framework in order to explore interactions between sectors and understand the potential ramifications of climate mitigation actions.

GCAM has been developed at PNNL for over 20 years and is now a freely available community model and documented online (See below). The team at JGCRI is comprised of economists, engineers, energy experts, forest ecologists, agricultural scientists, and climate system scientists who develop the model and apply it to a range of science and policy questions and work closely with Earth system and ecosystem modelers to integrate the human decision components of GCAM into their analyses.

Model Overview

GCAM is a dynamic-recursive model with technology-rich representations of the economy, energy sector, land use and water linked to a climate model that can be used to explore climate change mitigation policies including carbon taxes, carbon trading, regulations and accelerated deployment of energy technology. Regional population and labor productivity growth assumptions drive the energy and land-use systems employing numerous technology options to produce, transform, and provide energy services as well as to produce agriculture and forest products, and to determine land use and land cover. Using a run period extending from 1990 – 2100 at 5 year intervals, GCAM has been used to explore the potential role of emerging energy supply technologies and the greenhouse gas consequences of specific policy measures or energy technology adoption including; CO2 capture and storage, bioenergy, hydrogen systems, nuclear energy, renewable energy technology, and energy use technology in buildings, industry and the transportation sectors. GCAM is an Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP)-class model. This means it can be used to simulate scenarios, policies, and emission targets from various sources including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Output includes projections of future energy supply and demand and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions, radiative forcing and climate effects of 16 greenhouse gases, aerosols and short-lived species at 0.5×0.5 degree resolution, contingent on assumptions about future population, economy, technology, and climate mitigation policy.

Documentation

Selected Publications

Calvin, K., Patel, P., Clarke, L., Asrar, G., Bond-Lamberty, B., Cui, R. Y., Di Vittorio, A., Dorheim, K., Edmonds, J., Hartin, C., Hejazi, M., Horowitz, R., Iyer, G., Kyle, P., Kim, S., Link, R., McJeon, H., Smith, S. J., Snyder, A., Waldhoff, S., and Wise, M.: GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 677–698, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019, 2019.

Edmonds, J., and J. Reilly (1985)Global Energy: Assessing the Future (Oxford University Press, New York) pp.317.

Edmonds, J., M. Wise, H. Pitcher, R. Richels, T. Wigley, and C. MacCracken. (1997) “An Integrated Assessment of Climate Change and the Accelerated Introduction of Advanced Energy Technologies”, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1, pp. 311-39

Kim, S.H., J. Edmonds, J. Lurz, S. J. Smith, and M. Wise (2006) “The ObjECTS Framework for Integrated Assessment: Hybrid Modeling of Transportation ” Energy Journal (Special Issue #2) pp 51-80.

Full list of GCAM publications