😢

What does this suppose to mean? 🤔

It means that's unfortunate, since this library makes ** heavy ** usage of execCommand and there's no existing alternative. Do you have any ideas?

Nope :( and I am using it in my upcoming project. Might have to remove it ☹️

FYI, almost all other WYSIWYG editors will also be using execCommand

So sad.
I was using LitElement to create a wrapper around a WYSIWYG editor.
Pell was the only editor that worked with shadow DOM because of it's use of execCommand

I'd be surprised if this was removed any time soon. Are you still working on Pell, @jaredreich ?

@danleyb2 I agree with VaelVictus, I don't think execCommand will be going anywhere. There's no alternatives available for contenteditable and it's widely used in almost all wysiwyg editors.

@VaelVictus I have been actually, but unfortunately it's been going extremely slow due to work and life stuff... you know. I'd like to get ramped up asap and solve all the issues and release v2.

Looking at the codebase of Squire, TinyMCE, Medium Editor & Trix and all use execCommand at some capacity. Others that don't are just too bulky for my taste.

@jaredreich Are you still interested in a v2? There are some nice pull requests you might want to review for v1.