Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

http-spi test improvement #62

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 4, 2016
Merged

http-spi test improvement #62

merged 2 commits into from May 4, 2016

Conversation

charuvijay
Copy link
Contributor

@charuvijay charuvijay commented Dec 29, 2015

Dear Team,

This pull request is focused on http-spi module.
Code coverage is measured using JaCoCo. This pull request increases code
coverage of the whole project by 90%.

Metric Before After

Coverage% |0% |90%

Lines Covered|0 |317

Total Lines |349 |349

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Vijay
DevFactory - Code Quality Team.

commit ca9227e961ca074d4bfa42d801d7aeb810af98b4
Author: Charu
Date: Wed Dec 23 20:58:54 2015 +0530

Added Review Comments

commit ff30f698bfacd769b96f74c8c2a3a621900b5239
Author: Charu
Date: Wed Dec 23 09:56:07 2015 +0530

Unit tests for http-spi UTS-60

@gregw
Copy link
Contributor

gregw commented Dec 29, 2015

Charu ,

Awesome to get a PR that is so well tested!

I'll look at this over the next day or two. However, we need to get you to e-sign a contributors license. So you need to create an account on bugzilla and click the IP tick next to your name.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Jetty

@gregw
Copy link
Contributor

gregw commented Dec 29, 2015

Oh and a little quibble... it would be great if you could reformat with our coding style - which can be found: http://git.eclipse.org/c/jetty/org.eclipse.jetty.admin.git/tree/

mfarid and others added 2 commits Jan 2, 2016
Signed-off-by: mfarid <farid.iflex@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mfarid <mohd.farid@devfactory.com>
@mfarid
Copy link

mfarid commented Jan 2, 2016

@gregw I have already signed the CLA but the same is not reflected in the ip-validation check.

Can you please help me fix this issue.

@joakime
Copy link
Member

joakime commented Feb 15, 2016

CLA now verified via https://projects.eclipse.org/user/cla/validate

@jmcc0nn3ll
Copy link
Member

jmcc0nn3ll commented Feb 15, 2016

Bumping to check the CLA on file.

(Note: using this issue to test out the webhook validation)

@jmcc0nn3ll jmcc0nn3ll changed the title Squashed commit of the following: Issue #62 http-spi test improvement Feb 15, 2016
@jmcc0nn3ll jmcc0nn3ll changed the title Issue #62 http-spi test improvement http-spi test improvement Feb 15, 2016
@gregw
Copy link
Contributor

gregw commented May 4, 2016

Manual IP validation shows you have signed the CLA. So I'll merge one way or another...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants