I was looking at the issues for this and came across this. Is it possible to have app level Auth provider without PAT, may be that will help other extensions use the same provider seemlessly without users having to manually enter PAT?

@GitMensch Thx

What is the holdup on this getting merged?

@stripedpajamas What do you think about this PR?

It feels to me like it will be a pain to maintain this patch as upstream continues development. It's fine to merge it in, just foreseeing it drift like the other patches and this one is more complex imo.

@stripedpajamas This patch isn't so complex. I just remove some parts of the code, nothing more. So it's easy.
I will add a section in the doc about that change, then I will merge it.

Looks good to me, I'd also merge after CI is finished. It should definitely be integrated into tonight's 1.60!

@GitMensch Yep. That's why I've made it.

@GitMensch Can you check the doc if it's good enough? Thx

I already did,and wanted to explicit write "thanks for the doc update", somehow that got lost from my typing...
Yes, docs are fine. Thanks again.

FYI, did I mention that GitHub doing diff's on .diff files is absolutely crazy?

Just when you need something to laugh look un unified view at one or few commits in this PR: 😅