-
Updated
Feb 24, 2022
threat-modeling
Here are 78 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Nov 24, 2021 - Dockerfile
-
Updated
Nov 12, 2020
-
Updated
Feb 15, 2022 - Go
CSS Fixes
Describe the bug
This will be a tracker issue for any of the further PRs I make to fix small CSS fixes.
- The threat dragon mascot's size is not responsive and goes out of the screen for various devices!
Any additional context, screenshots, etc
If you also find any such bug and would like it to be fixed, feel free to comment below and I'll take a look at it!
-
Updated
Nov 10, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Feb 7, 2019
-
Updated
Jun 16, 2021
-
Updated
Feb 27, 2020
Expected behaviour
Actual behaviour
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
Version of CAIRIS
Details of browser or, if applicable, details of the OS used to host CAIRIS
-
Updated
Nov 30, 2020
-
Updated
Jul 8, 2021
-
Updated
Jul 8, 2021 - C#
-
Updated
Dec 29, 2019
After every player has passed, but before a new card has been drawn, the "Remove Threat" button is still clickable.
The UI suggests that everything is ok, but the threat does not get removed in this corner case.
I believe it is due to
if (hasPlayerPassed(G, ctx) || (threat.owner !== ctx.playerID)) {
return INVALID_MOVE;
}in deleteThreats() in moves.js. One is still at
-
Updated
Jan 14, 2021
-
Updated
May 15, 2021
-
Updated
Oct 3, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Mar 17, 2022 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Jul 3, 2018 - Gherkin
-
Updated
Sep 3, 2019
-
Updated
Mar 13, 2022
-
Updated
Oct 9, 2018
-
Updated
Oct 6, 2018
-
Updated
Mar 2, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
Dec 9, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Aug 2, 2019
-
Updated
Oct 9, 2018
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the threat-modeling topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the threat-modeling topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
"AA03": { "description": "Weakness in SSO Authorization", "source": (Process, Element), "target": (Process, Server), "condition": "target.implementsAuthenticationScheme is False", },What if the Process implements BasicAuth or uses mutual TLS (neither of which is SSO)?
If the Process uses SAML or OAuth, then maybe.
Maybe authenticationScheme as a string var is neces