New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Confusing headings in "Configuring the private fork policy for a repository" #15265
Comments
|
Thanks for opening this issue. A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
|
Thanks so much for opening an issue! I'll triage this for the team to take a look |
|
@oraclown - many thanks for reporting this bug in the docs. It sounds as if we overlooked this article the last time the UI was revised. I'm going to check our internal issues to see whether any other articles are affected before recommending steps to fix this problem. |
|
@oraclown - I asked about this and discovered that the procedure you mention is only available for private repositories and not public repositories. The repository you link to is a public repository, so I think this is why you don't see these options. The section of that article that describes the options for public repositories is: Configuring required approval for workflows from public forks. I think that the headings in this article are confusing because it's not clear that we're talking about the visibility of the parent repository and not the fork. I suggest we update the article as follows:
|
|
Thanks for the info, and I think those edits would help! |
|
Great - I'll update the issue summary accordingly and add a |
|
@oraclown - thank you for raising this issue to highlight the confusing headings in this article |
Code of Conduct
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/enabling-features-for-your-repository/managing-github-actions-settings-for-a-repository#enabling-workflows-for-private-repository-forks
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
The picture under Step 4 "Under Fork pull request workflows, select your options. For example:" contains an option to make repository secrets available to fork PR workflows, when this is no longer an option. Confusing.
Additional information
Here is another doc that makes clear this is no longer an option.
I stumbled on this confusing mismatch because tests are failing since the secrets aren't available for a contributor's PR.
Update from a maintainer
After discussion (see comments below), we realized that the article is correct but that the headings are confusing.
Recommended updates to the article
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: