@nodejs/http wdyt?

I'm in favor if this is not costing much too much throughput.

I think we should add a new option to enable the check (as a minor), and then make a breaking change to flip that default.

@mcollina @ronag hey, I'm just getting started, do you mind if I try to pull this off?

Looks like an interesting ticket, good luck with it @betochf 👍

Please do let me know though in case if I can take over 🙈

@betochf Are you still on it?

May I start working on this issue? As I think I would be able to create a PR for the same.

@ronag may please help me with a specific test case which I can add as a test and also I can use that to test my changes.

if this will be a perf drop, what about a config flag for strict validation?
also this assumes that we know the size of the payload before sending it :) which from exp may not always be the case.
I think its the RECEIVER of the content that should validate the size against the headers. :)

there are very specific conditions when to send this header.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.3.2

If we consider request payloads "inputs" its the receiving system that should validated those 🤔

Hi everyone !!!!!
Good Day!!
Its my first time contributing to an open source project.
Wanna know if this issue is still being worked upon.
And any insights for this issue would be very helpful.

Hey everyone,
I am looking forward to contribute in this , so can anyone help me on how to start with contributing as I have just started the open source contribution .
So please share the steps of how to start contributing here .