Textfield to support dependant values#445
Conversation
|
Hi @autogun, thanks for the PR! I'll check it later One question: what happens, if you change value in "Drop-A"? Will "Text-A" be updated? But to be honest, I would prefer to go the way of #320 here, i.e. use "default" value rather than "values". For me, "default" option feels more natural. |
|
Yes, By use to: |
|
Yes, exactly this one |
|
How about consistency? Across all config, |
|
Apparently, As for me, the word |
|
@bugy, one way to achieve this is in my last commit, but that still uses the infrastructure of |
|
Hi @autogun, sorry for taking so long. To be honest, I would prefer to keep the code explicit, in this sense I would suggest to introduce explicit On the client side, you would need to listen to "default" changes (not values) |
|
supported via "default" option in scope of #320. So closing this one as obsolete. |
Following my embarrassing issue #442, trying to cherry-pick this change to hopefully merge it to master.
I'm not entirely sure the implementation is right thought. Meanwhile, this is what I got -
Screen.Recording.2021-05-25.at.23.16.55.mov