acme
Here are 456 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
May 7, 2022 - Shell
-
Updated
Apr 28, 2022 - Shell
-
Updated
Apr 21, 2022 - Shell
-
Updated
May 7, 2022 - Go
The recommendation is to set Cache-Control: private, no-store on any endpoint with sensitive information. Because while you can protect the traffic with TLS, you also need to keep sensitive information out of a client's (unencrypted) HTTP cache. I'm not sure how relevant this is to the API context of step-ca though—I've never seen an HTTP client library that caches content. But I guess the poi
-
Updated
May 6, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 25, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 1, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
May 4, 2022 - Shell
-
Updated
May 7, 2022 - C#
Add tests
Beyonce said it best. If you like it then you shoulda put a test on it. Scenarios I like:
- Cert is created with right DN
- Cert is stored to X509Store after creation
- Cert request is not resubmitted
- Handles failures gracefully
- HTTP challenge/response works as expected
- Certificate renewal when cert is about to expiration
-
Updated
Apr 3, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 21, 2022 - PowerShell
-
Updated
Dec 30, 2019 - Dockerfile
-
Updated
May 8, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
Jun 23, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Nov 21, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
May 6, 2022 - Shell
As @rjkroege mentioned in rjkroege/edwood#288 tokenizing the results of the getarg function would allow for more robust parsing of the given arguments.
-
Updated
Feb 16, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
May 6, 2022 - C
-
Updated
May 3, 2022 - Perl
-
Updated
Mar 22, 2021 - Vim script
-
Updated
Feb 17, 2022 - Go
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the acme topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the acme topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
certbot/docs/install.rstpoints to certbot-auto uninstall instructionscertbot/docs/uninstall.rstcertbot-auto uninstall instructionscertbot/docs/using.rstcertbot-auto is mentioned as a deprecated installation method that people might need to change the command in response toAt some point, we should probably remove these, possibly depending on how our usage statistics look.