JSON

First check

• I added a very descriptive title to this issue.
• I used the GitHub search to find a similar issue and didn't find it.
• I searched the FastAPI documentation, with the integrated search.
• I already searched in Google "How to X in FastAPI" and didn't find any information.
• I already read and followed all the tutorial in the docs and didn't find an answ

I was trying to add formula SUM(G2:H2) which will result to I2, but the result goes to I3 and the header column is automatically becoming "8".

Before

let worksheets = {};
for (const sheetName of workbook.SheetNames) {
worksheets[sheetName] =

When you want to help with the development of this library, there are plenty of things were you are more than welcome:

Blocked Issues

• In #3106, the missing possibility to switch on JSON_DIAGNOSTICS via CMake when installing the library via Homebrew. If you are familiar with Homebrew, you could fix [the formula](https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/HEAD/Formula/nlohmann-json.

Describe a bug.

1. No more-options button is shown on mobile devices :
   

2. When clicking on + button the tool set are going beyond toolbar
   

Steps to reprodu

Though we include Boost JSON as a dependency for benchmarking purposes, we do not include it as part of our benchmarks currently.

I get this warning when committing:

@rjsf/core: ⚠ Some of your tasks use `git add` command. Please remove it from the config since all modifications made by tasks will be automatically added to the git commit index.

Hello!

While using setBindings() and referring to the docs comment in the types, I expected it to at least overwrite existing fields. However, it ends up duplicating the field in the log.

Is this the intended behavior? Based on this unit test, I didn't

Got has a very good coverage test-wise. Would be nice to port relevant tests that we're missing over to Ky.

Note: Not for https://github.com/sindresorhus/ky/blob/master/test/browser.js, but for everything else.

Saw this rule in the clj-kondo linter, and I think it would be a good addition to our strict mode. Having duplicate elements in sets is probably always a mistake in a production policy, and while it's "harmless", the intent is likely to provide another element rather than the duplicate, leading to an unexpected