-
Updated
May 28, 2022 - C#
model-checking
Here are 241 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Feb 9, 2021
-
Updated
May 11, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
May 23, 2017 - TLA
-
Updated
Feb 24, 2021 - R
-
Updated
Apr 15, 2022 - TLA
-
Updated
May 27, 2022 - C++
-
Updated
May 26, 2022 - C
-
Updated
Jan 8, 2022
-
Updated
May 25, 2022 - Erlang
The TlaDocumentSymbolsProvider stumbles on operators while parsing constants and doesn't report them as model symbols. As a result, const operator names don't appear in the outline panel and in completion suggestions. Such operators also prevent parsing of the following constants.
A simple case:
CONSTANT Foo(_), BarNeither Foo nor Bar makes it to the model symbols list
-
Updated
Feb 8, 2022 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Dec 16, 2020 - Haskell
-
Updated
May 7, 2022 - Shell
-
Updated
May 27, 2022 - Java
There are several unused parameter warnings all over the place.
As these parameters mostly exist on purpose (e.g. for function overloading), those warnings can probably be ignored.
Once we are at c++17, we should insert the new attribute [[maybe_unused]] wherever this is the case.
-
Updated
May 24, 2022 - C++
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 20, 2021 - Scala
-
Updated
Apr 20, 2022 - C
-
Updated
Jun 25, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 25, 2022 - C++
-
Updated
May 28, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 14, 2022 - TLA
-
Updated
Mar 12, 2019 - Haskell
-
Updated
Feb 22, 2022 - Haskell
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the model-checking topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the model-checking topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
We should introduce a flag (and an associated proof harness annotation) to enable
--malloc-can-failin CBMC.At first, this might seem useless, because many
stddata structures will simply panic on allocation failure. (And without #692, this just means all such proof harnesses would just have failures that are unavoidable.)But there is
no-stdRust code out there that might be very int