Skip to content
#

static-code-analysis

Here are 431 public repositories matching this topic...

bbatsov
bbatsov commented Dec 2, 2020

There are some annoying warnings when building the documentation site:

$ antora --pull antora-playbook.yml
asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute: 1
asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute: 3
asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute: word
asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute: word
asciidoctor: W
documentation good first issue maintenance
semgrep
datree
noaabarki
noaabarki commented Feb 24, 2022

Describe the solution you'd like

Validate test commands arguments before Run. This pattern will allow us to governance behaviors such as flags/arguments validation in all commands. Additionally, this should make the code easier to understand and maintain.

Requirements
Golang basic level.

“How to Implement” suggestion

See [issue](datreeio/datree#4

enhancement good first issue up for grabs
reviewdog
davidak
davidak commented Jun 18, 2018

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. create .bandit file with content:
[bandit]
tests: B101,B102,B301

  1. run bandit -c .bandit -r module/
  2. get error:
    [main] ERROR .bandit : Error parsing file.

Expected behavior
working as described in readme

Bandit version

ba
bug good first issue
ywanHK
ywanHK commented May 29, 2022

Bug description

I'm currently working with a project that involves calculations of large numbers.

If I have a file named test.py containing the single line:

test0 = 15 ** 20220529

It takes on average 1 minute to produce any output

Configuration

No response

Command used

python3 -m pylint test.py

Pylint output

Astroid good first issue topic-performance
revive
zimmski
zimmski commented Apr 7, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When one is using the method "WriteString" of the type "strings::Builder" and does not handle the error it is flagged because all errors must be handled. However, This method never returns an error. Hence, it makes sense to ignore it (even by default).

The problem with revive is, that it does not allow to ignore methods with

msridhar
msridhar commented Jan 22, 2022

This would allow for more localized suppressions. Say we have a method foo(Object o) in an annotated third-party library where o has no type annotation, but o really should be @Nullable, as foo() can handle being passed null as a parameter. In code checked by NullAway, say you write:

void bigMethod() {
  ...
  foo(null); // NullAway reports an error
  ...
}

I beli

Fernal73
Fernal73 commented Nov 2, 2021
[spotbugs] Running SpotBugs...     
    [spotbugs] Unexpected problem occured during version sanity check         
    [spotbugs] Reported exception:         
[spotbugs] java.lang.AbstractMethodError: Receiver class org.slf4j.nop.NOPServiceProvider does not define or inherit an implementation of the resolved method 'abstract java.lang.String getRequesteApiVersion()' of interface org.slf4j.
FullValueRider
FullValueRider commented Dec 10, 2021

Rubberduck version information
The info below can be copy-paste-completed from the first lines of Rubberduck's log or the About box:

Rubberduck version [Version 2.5.2.6030
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.22000.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office x64
Host Version: 16.0.14701.20226
Host Executable: WINWORD.EXE

Description
Language inspection for assignment of LCase suggests usi

bug enhancement feature-inspections up-for-grabs

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the static-code-analysis topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the static-code-analysis topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more