flux

It would be nice if each operator Javadoc could clearly define the backpressure behaviour.

RxJava does something like this, e.g. http://reactivex.io/RxJava/javadoc/io/reactivex/Flowable.html#flatMap-io.reactivex.functions.Function-

Because doing both

Seems like a bad idea...

Motivation

I recently ran into an issue where an exception thrown in Micrometer caused my request to break. The actual issue I ran into is not in reactor although reactor was used. However as reactor uses Micrometer as well and e.g. [here|https://github.com/reactor/reactor-netty/blob/main/reactor-netty-core/src/main/java/reactor/netty/channel/AbstractChannelMetricsHandler.java] there also does

I think it would be handy if Undux used React.forwardRef() to make sure that any refs attached to components created using withStore got attached to the wrapped component instead of the wrapper itself. Thoughts?

In the 60 minute blitz tutorial, we use a sequence of stacked Dense layers, each with no activation function. This doesn't make much sense, as multiple linear operators can always be combined down into a single linear operator:

julia> using Flux
    

What I mean:

const countAtom = createNumberAtom()
createAtom(
  { count: countAtom },
  (track) => {
    track.onAction('count.increment', () => {})
    //                   ^
  }
)

https://github.com/defunctzombie/zuul is unmaintainced.
We want to replace zuul to another testing library.