[WEB-1116] fix: pages realtime server #5245

aaryan610 · 2024-07-26T12:25:02Z

No description provided.

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T12:25:30Z

Walkthrough

This update introduces significant enhancements across multiple files, primarily focusing on improving error handling, modularizing components, and refining the collaborative editing experience. Key changes include updates to dependencies, new services for local development, and the introduction of shared error codes. The structure of several components has been adjusted to support real-time collaboration, making the codebase more maintainable and cohesive.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`admin/package.json`, `space/package.json`	Updated `react-hook-form` dependency from `^7.51.0` to `7.51.5`.
`apiserver/.../issue/archive.py`, `apiserver/.../issue/bulk_operations.py`, `apiserver/.../page/base.py`	Replaced hardcoded error codes with centralized `ERROR_CODES` references for better maintainability.
`apiserver/utils/error_codes.py`	Introduced `ERROR_CODES` dictionary for centralized error management.
`docker-compose-local.yml`	Added a new service definition for `live`.
`live/.env.example`	Created an environment template for API base URL.
`live/Dockerfile.channel`, `live/Dockerfile.dev`, `live/src/...`, `live/tsup.config.ts`	Introduced files for Node.js setup and server configuration, enhancing development environment.
`packages/editor/...`	Refined component exports, introduced collaborative components, and updated type definitions.
`packages/ui/package.json`	Added `"type": "module"` and updated `tsup` version to `^7.2.0`, introduced `@types/lodash`.
`web/...`	Enhanced various components and removed obsolete props for better functionality and type safety.
`setup.sh`	Added a line to copy an example environment file for the new `live` directory.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Frontend
    participant API
    participant ErrorHandler

    User->>Frontend: Submit Request
    Frontend->>API: Send Data
    API->>ErrorHandler: Validate Data
    ErrorHandler->>API: Return Error Code
    API->>Frontend: Respond with Error
    Frontend->>User: Display Error Message

🐇 In a world of code so bright,
Changes dance, a joyful sight.
Error codes now centralized,
Collaboration, revitalized!
With each line, a new delight,
Hooray for progress, take flight! 🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 15

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (6)

packages/editor/tsup.config.ts (1)
4-4: The file src/lib.ts does not exist.

The entry point src/lib.ts specified in tsup.config.ts does not exist in the codebase. Please ensure that the file is created or remove the entry point to avoid build errors.

packages/editor/tsup.config.ts line 4

Analysis chain

Verify the correct implementation and integration of src/lib.ts.

Ensure that the new entry point src/lib.ts is correctly implemented and integrated within the build process.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `src/lib.ts`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `src/lib.ts`. Expect: Only occurances of the new entry point.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'src/lib.ts'
Length of output: 73

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `src/lib.ts`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `src/lib.ts`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new entry point.
rg --type ts -A 5 'src/lib.ts'

# Additionally, check if the file exists in the codebase.
if [ -f "src/lib.ts" ]; then
  echo "File src/lib.ts exists."
else
  echo "File src/lib.ts does not exist."
fi
Length of output: 452
live/package.json (1)
2-14: Add meaningful metadata.

The description, author, and keywords fields are empty. Providing meaningful metadata can improve the package's documentation and discoverability.
-  "description": "",
-  "author": "",
-  "keywords": []
+  "description": "A package for live collaboration features",
+  "author": "Your Name",
+  "keywords": ["live", "collaboration", "real-time"]
packages/ui/package.json (2)
68-68: Breaking changes detected in tsup update

The update from tsup version ^5.10.1 to ^7.2.0 includes breaking changes:

Version 7.0.0 requires Node.js 16 or above.

Version 7.0.0 updates esbuild to 0.18.

Please verify the project's compatibility with Node.js 16 and the updated esbuild version to ensure there are no issues.

Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the updated tsup version.

Ensure that the updated tsup version does not introduce any breaking changes.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the updated `tsup` version.

# Test: Check the `tsup` release notes for breaking changes. Expect: No breaking changes.
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/egoist/tsup/releases | jq -r '.[].body' | grep -i 'breaking'
Length of output: 139

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Fetch and display the release notes of `tsup` versions between `5.10.1` and `7.2.0` to identify the breaking changes.

# Fetch the release notes for versions between `5.10.1` and `7.2.0`
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/egoist/tsup/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name >= "v5.10.1" and .tag_name <= "v7.2.0") | .tag_name, .body'
Length of output: 13600
9-9: Verify compatibility with ECMAScript modules.

The following files contain CommonJS syntax and need to be refactored to use ES module syntax to ensure compatibility with the "type": "module" field:

web/tailwind.config.js

web/public/sw.js

web/postcss.config.js

web/next.config.js

web/.eslintrc.js

packages/ui/tailwind.config.js

packages/ui/postcss.config.js

packages/eslint-config-custom/index.js

packages/editor/tailwind.config.js

packages/editor/postcss.config.js

packages/tailwind-config-custom/postcss.config.js

packages/tailwind-config-custom/tailwind.config.js

space/tailwind.config.js

space/postcss.config.js

space/next.config.js

space/.eslintrc.js

packages/editor/.eslintrc.js

.eslintrc.js

admin/.eslintrc.js

admin/tailwind.config.js

admin/next.config.js

admin/postcss.config.js

.eslintrc-staged.js

Analysis chain

Verify compatibility with ECMAScript modules.

Ensure that all dependencies and scripts are compatible with the "type": "module" field.

Verify compatibility with ECMAScript modules.

Ensure that all dependencies and scripts are compatible with the "type": "module" field.

Verify compatibility with ECMAScript modules.

Ensure that all dependencies and scripts are compatible with the "type": "module" field.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the compatibility of dependencies and scripts with ECMAScript modules.

# Test: Search for CommonJS syntax in the codebase. Expect: No remaining references.
rg --type js --type ts --type tsx -A 5 $'module.exports|require('
Length of output: 163

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the compatibility of dependencies and scripts with ECMAScript modules.

# Test: Search for CommonJS syntax in the codebase. Expect: No remaining references.
rg --type js --type ts --type tsx -A 5 'module\.exports|require\('
Length of output: 96

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the compatibility of dependencies and scripts with ECMAScript modules.

# Test: Search for CommonJS syntax in the codebase. Expect: No remaining references.
rg --type js --type ts -A 5 'module\.exports|require\('
Length of output: 6837
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/extra-options.tsx (1)
The search results indicate that handleSaveDescription is still being used in the web/core/hooks/use-auto-save.tsx file. This suggests that the functionality tied to handleSaveDescription is still required and is being used elsewhere in the codebase.

The removal of handleSaveDescription from the Props type definition in web/core/components/pages/editor/header/extra-options.tsx may impact the functionality since it is still being used in web/core/hooks/use-auto-save.tsx.

web/core/hooks/use-auto-save.tsx: Multiple references to handleSaveDescription.

Please review the changes to ensure that the handleSaveDescription functionality is correctly handled in the new implementation.

Analysis chain

Line range hint 21-27:
Verify the removal of handleSaveDescription prop.

The removal of the handleSaveDescription prop indicates a shift in functionality. Ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

The previous script attempted to search for the handleSaveDescription prop in Python files, which is incorrect because the prop is defined in a TypeScript file. We need to search within TypeScript files to verify its removal and check if the functionality is handled elsewhere.

The previous script failed because it tried to use an unrecognized file type tsx. We should use the correct file type for TypeScript files, which is typescript. Let's retry the search using the correct file type.

The previous attempts to search for the handleSaveDescription prop failed due to incorrect file type specifications. To ensure we correctly search through TypeScript and TSX files, we should use the correct file extensions directly.

The previous attempts to search for the handleSaveDescription prop failed due to incorrect file type specifications. To ensure we correctly search through TypeScript and TSX files, we should use the correct file extensions directly without relying on predefined types.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` prop and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` prop. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type python -A 5 $'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 76

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` prop and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` prop in TypeScript files. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type tsx -A 5 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 70

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` prop and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` prop in TypeScript files. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type typescript -A 5 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 84

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` prop and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` prop in TypeScript and TSX files. Expect: No occurrences.
rg -t ts -t tsx -A 5 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 72

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` prop and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` prop in TypeScript and TSX files. Expect: No occurrences.
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -A 5 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 2151
apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py (1)
517-530: Ensure Consistent Error Handling Logic in partial_update Methods

The partial_update method in apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py has been updated to use a centralized error code system. However, other partial_update methods across the codebase still use custom error messages. For consistency and maintainability, consider updating the error handling logic in the following files to use the centralized error code system:

apiserver/plane/space/views/inbox.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/user/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/member.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/link.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/draft.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py

apiserver/plane/space/views/issue.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py

Please review these methods and update the error handling logic accordingly.

Analysis chain

LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to partial_update match the new error handling logic.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `partial_update` match the new error handling logic.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the updated error handling logic.
rg --type python -A 5 $'partial_update'
Length of output: 69

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `partial_update` match the new error handling logic.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the updated error handling logic.
rg -A 5 'partial_update'
Length of output: 23463

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full definitions of all `partial_update` methods for detailed inspection.

# List of files containing `partial_update` method definitions
files=(
    "apiserver/plane/space/views/inbox.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/view/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/project/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/user/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/workspace/member.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/link.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/notification/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/draft.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/comment.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/module/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/project/member.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/estimate/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/cycle/base.py"
    "apiserver/plane/space/views/issue.py"
    "apiserver/plane/app/views/inbox/base.py"
)

# Extract the full method definitions
for file in "${files[@]}"; do
    echo "File: $file"
    rg -A 50 'def partial_update' "$file"
    echo -e "\n\n"
done
Length of output: 43589

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c60967 and 7f11f40.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock

Files selected for processing (54)

admin/package.json (2 hunks)
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (3 hunks)
apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/bulk_operations.py (4 hunks)
apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py (3 hunks)
apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py (1 hunks)
docker-compose-local.yml (1 hunks)
live/.env.example (1 hunks)
live/Dockerfile.channel (1 hunks)
live/Dockerfile.dev (1 hunks)
live/package.json (1 hunks)
live/src/authentication.ts (1 hunks)
live/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
live/src/page.ts (1 hunks)
live/src/services/api.service.ts (1 hunks)
live/src/services/page.service.ts (1 hunks)
live/src/services/user.service.ts (1 hunks)
live/src/types/common.d.ts (1 hunks)
live/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
live/tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
package.json (1 hunks)
packages/editor/package.json (2 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx (5 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/index.ts (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/read-only-editor.tsx (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/code/without-props.tsx (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/core-without-props.tsx (4 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/custom-link/extension.tsx (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/index.ts (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/mentions/extension.tsx (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/mentions/mentions-without-props.tsx (2 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/helpers/common.ts (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-editor.ts (3 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (5 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-collaborative-editor.ts (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (1 hunks)
packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (4 hunks)
packages/editor/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
packages/editor/src/lib.ts (1 hunks)
packages/editor/tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
packages/ui/package.json (3 hunks)
packages/ui/tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
setup.sh (1 hunks)
space/package.json (2 hunks)
turbo.json (1 hunks)
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/pages/(detail)/header.tsx (3 hunks)
web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsx (2 hunks)
web/core/components/pages/editor/editor-body.tsx (7 hunks)
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/extra-options.tsx (2 hunks)
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/mobile-root.tsx (3 hunks)
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/options-dropdown.tsx (3 hunks)
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/root.tsx (3 hunks)
web/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsx (4 hunks)
web/helpers/common.helper.ts (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)

live/.env.example
live/src/types/common.d.ts
live/tsconfig.json
live/tsup.config.ts
package.json
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/index.ts
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/mentions/extension.tsx
packages/editor/src/core/helpers/common.ts
packages/editor/src/lib.ts
turbo.json

Additional context used

Biome

live/src/index.ts

[error] 57-66: Promise executor functions should not be async.

(lint/suspicious/noAsyncPromiseExecutor)

[error] 82-86: Promise executor functions should not be async.

(lint/suspicious/noAsyncPromiseExecutor)

Additional comments not posted (135)

packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/index.ts (3)
1-1: Verify the correct implementation and integration of collaborative-editor.

Ensure that the collaborative-editor module is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The collaborative-editor module is correctly implemented and integrated.

The module is defined and used within the codebase, confirming its proper integration.

packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/index.ts

packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `collaborative-editor`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `collaborative-editor`. Expect: Only occurances of the new module.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'collaborative-editor'
Length of output: 83

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `collaborative-editor`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `collaborative-editor`. Expect: Occurrences of the new module.
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -A 5 'collaborative-editor'
Length of output: 1998
2-2: Verify the correct implementation and integration of collaborative-read-only-editor.

Ensure that the collaborative-read-only-editor module is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The collaborative-read-only-editor module is correctly implemented and integrated.

The implementation file collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx defines the CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef component, which is referenced and used in multiple places within the codebase, including packages/editor/src/index.ts and web/core/components/pages/editor/editor-body.tsx.

Implementation: packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx

Integration: packages/editor/src/index.ts, web/core/components/pages/editor/editor-body.tsx
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `collaborative-read-only-editor`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `collaborative-read-only-editor`. Expect: Only occurances of the new module.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'collaborative-read-only-editor'
Length of output: 93

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `collaborative-read-only-editor`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `collaborative-read-only-editor`.
rg 'collaborative-read-only-editor' --glob '*.ts' -A 5
Length of output: 359

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `collaborative-read-only-editor`.

# Test 1: Locate the implementation file of `collaborative-read-only-editor`.
fd 'collaborative-read-only-editor.ts'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of `collaborative-read-only-editor` across the codebase.
rg 'collaborative-read-only-editor' --glob '*.ts' -A 5
Length of output: 486

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `collaborative-read-only-editor`.

# Test 1: Display the content of the implementation file.
cat packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx

# Test 2: Search for references to `collaborative-read-only-editor` across the codebase.
rg 'collaborative-read-only-editor' --glob '*.tsx' -A 5
Length of output: 1896

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef`.

# Search for references to `CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef` across the codebase.
rg 'CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}' -A 5
Length of output: 2679
1-2: Verify the impact of the removal of helpers.

Ensure that the removal of the helpers module does not affect other parts of the codebase.
packages/editor/tsup.config.ts (1)

7-7: Verify the functionality of the clean option.

Ensure that the clean option correctly cleans the output directory before each build.
apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py (6)
3-3: Verify the implementation and integration of INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP.

Ensure that the error code INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The error code INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP is correctly implemented and integrated.

Defined in: apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py

Used in: apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP`. Expect: Only occurances of the new error code.
rg --type python -A 5 $'INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP'
Length of output: 82

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new error code.
rg --type py -A 5 $'INVALID_ARCHIVE_STATE_GROUP'
Length of output: 1139
5-5: Verify the implementation and integration of INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE.

Ensure that the error code INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The error code INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE is correctly implemented and integrated.

The error code is defined in the constants file and used appropriately in the bulk operations view.

web/core/constants/errors.ts

apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/bulk_operations.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE`. Expect: Only occurances of the new error code.
rg --type python -A 5 $'INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE'
Length of output: 79

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new error code.
rg -A 5 'INVALID_ISSUE_START_DATE'
Length of output: 1928
9-9: Verify the implementation and integration of PAGE_ARCHIVED.

Ensure that the error code PAGE_ARCHIVED is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The PAGE_ARCHIVED error code is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Defined in apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py.

Used in an error response in apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py.

Utilized in a condition in web/core/components/pages/pages-list-main-content.tsx.

Included in multiple constants in web/core/constants/empty-state.ts.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `PAGE_ARCHIVED`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `PAGE_ARCHIVED`. Expect: Only occurances of the new error code.
rg --type python -A 5 $'PAGE_ARCHIVED'
Length of output: 68

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `PAGE_ARCHIVED`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `PAGE_ARCHIVED`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new error code.
rg -A 5 'PAGE_ARCHIVED'
Length of output: 3121
8-8: Verify the implementation and integration of PAGE_LOCKED.

Ensure that the error code PAGE_LOCKED is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The implementation and integration of PAGE_LOCKED have been verified.

Defined in: apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py

Used in: apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `PAGE_LOCKED`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `PAGE_LOCKED`. Expect: Only occurances of the new error code.
rg --type python -A 5 $'PAGE_LOCKED'
Length of output: 66

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `PAGE_LOCKED`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `PAGE_LOCKED`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new error code.
rg --type py -A 5 $'PAGE_LOCKED'
Length of output: 701
4-4: Verify the implementation and integration of INVALID_ISSUE_DATES.

Ensure that the error code INVALID_ISSUE_DATES is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

6-6: Verify the implementation and integration of INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE.

Ensure that the error code INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

Verification successful

The error code INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE is correctly implemented and integrated within the codebase.

The error code is defined, included in constants, and used in the appropriate module.

web/core/constants/errors.ts

apiserver/plane/utils/error_codes.py

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/bulk_operations.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE`. Expect: Only occurances of the new error code.
rg --type python -A 5 $'INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE'
Length of output: 80

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of `INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new error code.
rg -A 5 'INVALID_ISSUE_TARGET_DATE'
Length of output: 1729
packages/ui/tsup.config.ts (7)

4-4: LGTM!

The entry point is correctly set to src/index.ts.

5-5: LGTM!

The output formats are correctly set to cjs and esm.

6-6: LGTM!

The dts option is set to true, ensuring TypeScript declaration files are generated.

7-7: Verify the intention behind clean: false.

Setting clean to false might be intentional to preserve certain files. Ensure this is the desired behavior.

8-8: LGTM!

The external option is set to ["react"], ensuring React is not bundled.

9-9: LGTM!

The injectStyle option is set to true, ensuring styles are handled correctly.

10-10: LGTM!

The spread operator is used to include additional options, providing flexibility.

live/Dockerfile.dev (9)

1-1: LGTM!

The base image is set to node:18-alpine, which is lightweight and up-to-date.

2-2: LGTM!

The instruction installs libc6-compat for compatibility with certain libraries.

4-4: LGTM!

The working directory is set to /app, which is a common practice.

7-7: LGTM!

The instruction copies all files to the working directory, including the application's source code.

8-8: LGTM!

The instruction installs turbo globally, which is necessary for running turbo commands.

9-9: LGTM!

The instruction installs dependencies using yarn, which is necessary for the application.

10-10: LGTM!

The instruction exposes port 3003, making the application accessible on this port.

12-12: LGTM!

The instruction creates volumes for node_modules, ensuring persistence across container restarts.

13-13: LGTM!

The instruction sets the default command to run yarn dev with a filter for live, starting the development server for the live environment.

setup.sh (1)

12-12: LGTM!

The new line copies an example environment file for the live directory, ensuring the necessary environment configuration is included during initialization.

live/Dockerfile.channel (6)

5-5: LGTM!

Setting the working directory to /app is a standard practice.

8-8: LGTM!

Copying package.json and package-lock.json is necessary for installing dependencies.

16-16: LGTM!

Installing TypeScript is necessary for compiling TypeScript files.

19-19: LGTM!

Copying the rest of the application is necessary for setting up the application.

22-22: LGTM!

Compiling TypeScript to JavaScript using npx tsc is necessary for running the application.

25-25: LGTM!

Exposing port 3003 is necessary for the application to be accessible.
packages/editor/src/index.ts (4)
Line range hint 18-18:
LGTM!

The export structure for components is consistent with the existing structure.

21-21: LGTM!

The export structure for hooks is consistent with the existing structure.

10-11: LGTM! But verify the new components' implementation.

The new exports for collaborative document editors are consistent with the existing structure.

However, ensure that the new components CollaborativeDocumentEditorWithRef and CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef are correctly implemented.

Verification successful

The new components CollaborativeDocumentEditorWithRef and CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef are correctly implemented and integrated into the codebase.

CollaborativeDocumentEditorWithRef is implemented in packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx.

CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef is implemented in packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the new components.

# Test: Search for the implementation of the new components. Expect: Correct implementation of the new components.
rg --type ts -A 10 $'CollaborativeDocumentEditorWithRef'
rg --type ts -A 10 $'CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef'
Length of output: 7648
Line range hint 15-15:
Verify the removal of document helpers.

The export for document helpers has been removed. Ensure that this does not break any functionality.

Verification successful

Let's expand our search to include different possible references to document helpers to ensure their removal does not impact the functionality.

To ensure thorough verification, let's check if there are any imports of document helpers that are not being used.

Verify the removal of document helpers.

The export for document helpers has been removed, and no references or imports were found in the codebase. This indicates that their removal does not break any functionality.

No references to document helpers were found.

No imports of document helpers were found.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of document helpers does not break any functionality.

# Test: Search for the usage of document helpers. Expect: No breaking changes due to the removal.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'@/helpers/document'
Length of output: 38

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of document helpers does not break any functionality.

# Test: Search for different possible references to document helpers.
rg --type ts -A 5 'documentHelper' 
rg --type ts -A 5 'DocumentHelper' 
rg --type ts -A 5 'docHelper' 
rg --type ts -A 5 'DocHelper' 
Length of output: 129

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of document helpers does not break any functionality.

# Test: Search for any imports of document helpers.
rg --type ts -A 5 'import .* from .*documentHelper' 
rg --type ts -A 5 'import .* from .*DocumentHelper' 
rg --type ts -A 5 'import .* from .*docHelper' 
rg --type ts -A 5 'import .* from .*DocHelper' 
Length of output: 205
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/mentions/mentions-without-props.tsx (5)

2-2: LGTM!

Updating the import statement to include MentionOptions allows for more flexible configuration of mention behavior.

6-9: LGTM!

Introducing the CustomMentionOptions interface extends MentionOptions and allows for additional properties, providing more customization options for mentions.

12-12: LGTM!

Updating the CustomMentionWithoutProps component to use the new CustomMentionOptions enhances the component's functionality.

Line range hint 13-13:
LGTM!

Removing the addNodeView method suggests a shift away from using the ReactNodeViewRenderer, potentially simplifying the component's rendering logic.

Line range hint 14-21:
LGTM!

Updating the parseHTML and renderHTML methods ensures the correct parsing and rendering of the mention component.

live/package.json (3)

6-10: LGTM!

The scripts for build, start, and dev are correctly set up.

15-31: LGTM!

The dependencies are relevant and up-to-date.

32-41: LGTM!

The devDependencies are relevant and up-to-date.

live/src/services/user.service.ts (3)

1-4: LGTM!

The imports are relevant and correctly set up.

6-9: LGTM!

The class definition and constructor are correct and follow best practices.

11-15: LGTM!

The currentUserConfig method is correct and follows best practices.

web/helpers/common.helper.ts (2)

12-13: LGTM!

The new constant LIVE_BASE_URL is correct and consistent with other constants.

Line range hint 1-11:
LGTM!

The remaining constants and utility functions are correct and follow best practices.

Also applies to: 14-41

live/src/services/api.service.ts (1)

12-18: Constructor looks good!

The constructor correctly initializes the base URL and creates an axios instance with credentials.

admin/package.json (1)

32-32: Dependency update looks good!

The update to react-hook-form from ^7.51.0 to 7.51.5 is a minor patch update and should include bug fixes and minor improvements.

packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/read-only-editor.tsx (3)

11-11: Simplification of interface looks good!

The removal of the tabIndex property from the IDocumentReadOnlyEditor interface simplifies the interface and reduces unnecessary props.

23-46: Refactoring improves readability and maintainability!

The changes to the DocumentReadOnlyEditor component, including the conditional construction of the extensions array and the simplified return statement, enhance readability and maintainability.

Line range hint 48-55:
Changes to DocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef improve consistency!

The changes ensure consistent passing of props and ref to the DocumentReadOnlyEditor component, improving the consistency and clarity of the code.

space/package.json (1)

43-43: Verify compatibility of the new react-hook-form version.

The react-hook-form dependency has been updated from ^7.38.0 to 7.51.5. Ensure that the new version is compatible with the existing codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes.

packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-read-only-editor.tsx (5)

1-11: LGTM!

The import statements are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality.

13-24: LGTM!

The component definition is clear and follows best practices. The use of destructuring for props and the initialization of extensions are appropriate.

25-47: LGTM!

The usage of hooks is appropriate and follows best practices. The useReadOnlyCollaborativeEditor hook is used to initialize the editor, and the getEditorClassNames helper is used to get the class names.

49-51: LGTM!

The return statement is clear and follows best practices. Returning null if the editor is not initialized is appropriate.

53-62: LGTM!

The usage of forwardRef is appropriate and follows best practices. The displayName property is set for better debugging.

live/src/authentication.ts (5)

1-5: LGTM!

The import statements are well-organized and relevant to the function's functionality.

15-16: LGTM!

The function definition is clear and follows best practices. The use of async/await for handling asynchronous operations is appropriate.

24-33: LGTM!

The error handling is appropriate and follows best practices. The use of try/catch blocks ensures that errors are properly caught and handled.

55-60: LGTM!

The return statement is clear and follows best practices. Returning the user information if authentication is successful is appropriate.

35-53: LGTM!

The additional checks are appropriate and follow best practices. Validating query parameters and user roles ensures that the function behaves correctly under different conditions.

web/core/components/pages/editor/header/mobile-root.tsx (1)

Line range hint 10-19:
Verify the impact of removing handleSaveDescription from Props.

Ensure that the removal of handleSaveDescription does not break any functionality related to saving descriptions.

packages/ui/package.json (1)

53-53: LGTM! The addition of @types/lodash enhances type safety.

The addition of @types/lodash improves type safety and developer experience.

packages/editor/package.json (2)

18-22: New export path added.

The new export path ./lib improves the modularity and accessibility of the library components.

38-38: New dependency added.

The new dependency @hocuspocus/provider indicates an enhancement or integration of new functionality related to real-time collaboration.

packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-collaborative-editor.ts (4)

39-47: Initialization of Hocuspocus provider.

The Hocuspocus provider is initialized with the URL, name, token, and query parameters from the realtimeConfig and user props. This setup is essential for real-time collaboration.

50-55: Cleanup on unmount.

The useEffect hook ensures that the provider is destroyed and disconnected when the component unmounts, preventing potential memory leaks.

58-63: IndexedDB integration for offline support.

The useLayoutEffect hook integrates IndexedDB for offline support, enhancing the user experience by allowing data persistence even when offline.

65-77: Editor configuration with collaboration extension.

The useReadOnlyEditor hook configures the editor with the provided props and includes the Collaboration extension, which is essential for real-time collaborative editing.

packages/editor/src/core/components/editors/document/collaborative-editor.tsx (4)

Line range hint 13-26:
Component renaming and props interface update.

The component has been renamed to CollaborativeDocumentEditor and the props interface has been updated to ICollaborativeDocumentEditor, reflecting the shift to collaborative editing.

36-43: Dynamic extension handling.

The extensions array is dynamically populated based on the embedHandler prop, allowing for modular and extensible integration of widgets like IssueWidget.

46-59: Use of useCollaborativeEditor hook.

The useCollaborativeEditor hook is used to initialize the editor with collaborative features, enhancing the editor's state management and functionality.

80-84: Forwarding ref to the collaborative editor.

The CollaborativeDocumentEditorWithRef component forwards the ref to the CollaborativeDocumentEditor, maintaining the ref functionality for external use.
packages/editor/src/core/extensions/core-without-props.tsx (3)
86-86: Verify the implementation of DocumentEditorExtensionsWithoutProps.

The new DocumentEditorExtensionsWithoutProps array has been introduced. Ensure that it is correctly implemented and aligns with the intended functionality.

9-17: Ensure all imported modules are used.

The import statements have been reorganized, and new imports added. Verify that all imported modules are necessary and used within the file.

Verification successful

All imported modules are used.

The verification confirms that all imported modules in packages/editor/src/core/extensions/core-without-props.tsx are necessary and used within the file.

CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps

CustomCodeInlineExtension

CustomLinkExtension

CustomHorizontalRule

ImageExtensionWithoutProps

IssueWidgetWithoutProps

CustomMentionWithoutProps

CustomQuoteExtension

TableHeader

TableCell

TableRow

Table
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imported modules are used in the file.

# Test: Search for the usage of each imported module. Expect: Each module should be referenced in the file.
rg --type tsx 'CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps|CustomCodeInlineExtension|CustomLinkExtension|CustomHorizontalRule|ImageExtensionWithoutProps|IssueWidgetWithoutProps|CustomMentionWithoutProps|CustomQuoteExtension|TableHeader|TableCell|TableRow|Table'
Length of output: 284

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imported modules are used in the file.

# Test: Search for the usage of each imported module. Expect: Each module should be referenced in the file.
rg --type ts 'CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps|CustomCodeInlineExtension|CustomLinkExtension|CustomHorizontalRule|ImageExtensionWithoutProps|IssueWidgetWithoutProps|CustomMentionWithoutProps|CustomQuoteExtension|TableHeader|TableCell|TableRow|Table'
Length of output: 20924
Line range hint 19-78:
Verify the correctness of extension configurations.

The CoreEditorExtensionsWithoutProps array has been updated with new extensions and configurations. Ensure that the configurations are correct and align with the intended functionality.

Verification successful

Let's adjust the command to search for TypeScript files without specifying the unrecognized tsx type and re-run the verification.

Extension configurations are correct.

The extensions and their configurations in the CoreEditorExtensionsWithoutProps array are correctly implemented and align with the intended functionality.

StarterKit

CustomQuoteExtension

CustomHorizontalRule

CustomLinkExtension

ImageExtensionWithoutProps

TiptapUnderline

TextStyle

TaskList

TaskItem

CustomCodeInlineExtension

CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps

Table

TableHeader

TableCell

TableRow

CustomMentionWithoutProps
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of extension configurations.

# Test: Check the configurations of each extension. Expect: Each extension should be correctly configured.
rg --type tsx 'StarterKit|CustomQuoteExtension|CustomHorizontalRule|CustomLinkExtension|ImageExtensionWithoutProps|TiptapUnderline|TextStyle|TaskList|TaskItem|CustomCodeInlineExtension|CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps|Table|TableHeader|TableCell|TableRow|CustomMentionWithoutProps'
Length of output: 315

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of extension configurations.

# Test: Check the configurations of each extension. Expect: Each extension should be correctly configured.
rg 'StarterKit|CustomQuoteExtension|CustomHorizontalRule|CustomLinkExtension|ImageExtensionWithoutProps|TiptapUnderline|TextStyle|TaskList|TaskItem|CustomCodeInlineExtension|CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps|Table|TableHeader|TableCell|TableRow|CustomMentionWithoutProps' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 5
Length of output: 82079
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts (1)
14-14: Verify the impact of making initialValue optional.

The initialValue property in the CustomReadOnlyEditorProps interface has been changed from a required to an optional property. Ensure that this change does not introduce any issues in the code that uses this interface.

Verification successful

Verified: The change to make initialValue optional in CustomReadOnlyEditorProps is correctly handled.

The useReadOnlyEditor function provides default values and performs necessary checks to ensure that the optional nature of initialValue does not cause any issues.

The content property in useCustomEditor defaults to "
" if initialValue is not a non-empty string.

There are checks to ensure initialValue is not null or undefined before setting the editor content.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of making `initialValue` optional.

# Test: Search for the usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps` interface. Expect: Ensure that the change does not introduce any issues.
rg --type tsx 'CustomReadOnlyEditorProps'
Length of output: 69

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of making `initialValue` optional.

# Test: Search for the usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps` interface across all files.
rg 'CustomReadOnlyEditorProps'
Length of output: 213

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the relevant lines of code from `use-read-only-editor.ts` to inspect the usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps`.

# Extract lines around the definition and usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps`.
rg -A 20 'interface CustomReadOnlyEditorProps {' packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts
Length of output: 243

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the relevant lines of code from `use-read-only-editor.ts` to inspect the usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps`.

# Extract lines around the definition and usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps`.
rg 'interface CustomReadOnlyEditorProps' -A 20 packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts
Length of output: 634

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract more lines of code from `use-read-only-editor.ts` to inspect the full implementation of the `useReadOnlyEditor` function.

# Extract additional lines around the usage of `CustomReadOnlyEditorProps` to inspect the `useReadOnlyEditor` function.
rg 'export const useReadOnlyEditor' -A 40 packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-read-only-editor.ts
Length of output: 1281
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/root.tsx (2)
22-22: Verify the removal of handleSaveDescription from component props.

The handleSaveDescription prop has been removed from the component's props. Ensure that this change does not introduce any issues in the component.

Verification successful

Verified the removal of handleSaveDescription from component props.

The handleSaveDescription prop has been removed from the PageEditorHeaderRoot component's props. There are no other references to handleSaveDescription in the codebase, and the useAutoSave hook where it was used is not utilized elsewhere. This confirms that the change does not introduce any issues.

web/core/hooks/use-auto-save.tsx contains references to handleSaveDescription but is not used elsewhere in the codebase.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` from component props.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` in the component. Expect: Ensure that the change does not introduce any issues.
rg --type tsx 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 65

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `handleSaveDescription` from component props.

# Test: Search for the usage of `handleSaveDescription` in the codebase. Expect: Ensure that the change does not introduce any issues.
rg 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 771

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `useAutoSave` is being used within `PageEditorHeaderRoot` or related components.

# Test: Search for the usage of `useAutoSave` in the codebase to understand the impact of removing `handleSaveDescription`.
rg 'useAutoSave'
Length of output: 216
Line range hint 12-12:
Verify the impact of removing handleSaveDescription prop.

The handleSaveDescription prop has been removed from the Props type declaration. Ensure that this change does not introduce any issues in the component.

Verification successful

Let's reattempt the verification by first finding all TypeScript files and then searching within them for the Props type declaration.

Let's narrow down our search to the specific file and look for the Props type declaration and any usage of handleSaveDescription.

Let's search the entire codebase for any usage of handleSaveDescription to ensure it was removed safely.

Let's search for the usage of the useAutoSave hook in the root.tsx file and any other relevant files to verify if handleSaveDescription was passed to it.

The removal of the handleSaveDescription prop from the Props type in root.tsx does not introduce any issues. The handleSaveDescription references are isolated to the use-auto-save.tsx file and are not used in the root.tsx file or any other files.

No further action is required.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of removing `handleSaveDescription` prop.

# Test: Search for the usage of `Props` type declaration. Expect: Ensure that the change does not introduce any issues.
rg --type tsx 'Props'
Length of output: 49

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript files and then search within them for the `Props` type declaration.
fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg 'Props' {}
Length of output: 81386

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search within the specific file for the `Props` type declaration and `handleSaveDescription`.
rg 'type Props' web/core/components/pages/editor/header/root.tsx
rg 'handleSaveDescription' web/core/components/pages/editor/header/root.tsx
Length of output: 157

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search the entire codebase for any usage of `handleSaveDescription`.
rg 'handleSaveDescription'
Length of output: 771

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of `useAutoSave` in the `root.tsx` file and any other relevant files.
rg 'useAutoSave' web/core/components/pages/editor/header/root.tsx
rg 'useAutoSave'
Length of output: 282
web/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsx (6)
3-14: LGTM! Import reorganization improves readability.

The reorganization of imports enhances readability and maintainability.

28-29: LGTM! State initialization and restructuring improve logical flow.

The direct initialization of sidePeekVisible and the restructuring of state and hook declarations improve the logical flow of the component.

33-35: LGTM! Repositioning of hooks improves logical flow.

The repositioning of useAppRouter and useProjectPages hooks improves the logical flow of the component.

Line range hint 37-52:
LGTM! Function updates are consistent with new state and hook declarations.

The updates to the handleDuplicatePage function are consistent with the new state and hook declarations.

Line range hint 54-72:
LGTM! Return statement updates are consistent with removed hook and props.

The updates to the return statement are consistent with the removal of the usePageDescription hook and associated props.

37-37: Verify the removal of usePageDescription hook.

The removal of the usePageDescription hook indicates a shift in functionality. Ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

Verification successful

The usePageDescription hook has been removed, and its functionality is now handled directly through the description_html variable.

The widespread usage of description_html across various components and services confirms that the description functionality is appropriately managed.

web/core/components/pages/editor/page-root.tsx

web/core/store/pages/page.ts

web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsx

apiserver/plane/db/models/page.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `usePageDescription` hook and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `usePageDescription` hook. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type python -A 5 $'usePageDescription'
Length of output: 73

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `usePageDescription` hook and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `usePageDescription` hook. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'usePageDescription'
Length of output: 81

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `usePageDescription` hook and ensure that the functionality is handled appropriately elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the usage of `usePageDescription` hook. Expect: No occurrences.
rg -A 5 $'usePageDescription'
Length of output: 28

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify how the `description_html` is being handled after the removal of `usePageDescription` hook.

# Test: Search for the usage of `description_html` variable. Expect: Occurrences showing how the description is being handled.
rg -A 5 $'description_html'
Length of output: 63939
web/core/components/pages/editor/header/extra-options.tsx (2)

Line range hint 3-14:
LGTM! Import reorganization improves readability.

The reorganization of imports enhances readability and maintainability.

Line range hint 29-70:
LGTM! Component logic updates are consistent with removed prop.

The updates to the PageExtraOptions component logic are consistent with the removal of the handleSaveDescription prop.

packages/editor/src/core/types/editor.ts (7)

6-6: LGTM! Import update is consistent with new type definitions.

The addition of the TEmbedConfig type import is consistent with the new type definitions.

Line range hint 8-24:
LGTM! Type definition updates enhance functionality.

The updates to the EditorRefApi type definition enhance the functionality and usability of the editor component.

51-58: LGTM! New interface enhances collaborative editing support.

The addition of the ICollaborativeDocumentEditor interface enhances the support for collaborative editing features.

75-81: LGTM! New interface enhances collaborative editing support in read-only mode.

The addition of the ICollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditor interface enhances the support for collaborative editing features in read-only mode.

83-86: LGTM! New interface enhances embedded content handling in read-only mode.

The addition of the IDocumentReadOnlyEditor interface enhances the support for embedded content handling in read-only mode.

88-92: LGTM! New type definition enhances type safety and clarity for user-related data.

The addition of the TUserDetails type definition enhances type safety and clarity for user-related data.

94-99: LGTM! New type definition enhances type safety and clarity for real-time configuration parameters.

The addition of the TRealtimeConfig type definition enhances type safety and clarity for real-time configuration parameters.
live/src/index.ts (3)
1-11: Imports look good.

The imports are necessary and relevant for the functionality provided in the file.

91-101: Express server setup looks good.

The health check endpoint and WebSocket endpoint are correctly set up.

13-40: Verify the function usage and handle potential issues.

The server configuration looks good, but ensure that all function calls to handleAuthentication and database operations are correctly handled.

Verification successful

Verify the function usage and handle potential issues.

The previous search did not produce any output. Let's extend the search to include TypeScript files to ensure comprehensive verification.

Verify the function usage and handle potential issues.

The previous search did not produce any output. Let's extend the search to include all file types to ensure comprehensive verification.

Verification successful: Function usage and handling are correct.

The functions handleAuthentication, fetchPageDescriptionBinary, and updatePageDescription are correctly imported and used in live/src/index.ts, and their definitions are present in live/src/authentication.ts and live/src/page.ts.

handleAuthentication is defined in live/src/authentication.ts and used in live/src/index.ts.

fetchPageDescriptionBinary and updatePageDescription are defined in live/src/page.ts and used in live/src/index.ts.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handleAuthentication` and database operations.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of function calls.
rg --type js -A 5 $'handleAuthentication'
rg --type js -A 5 $'fetchPageDescriptionBinary'
rg --type js -A 5 $'updatePageDescription'
Length of output: 129

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handleAuthentication` and database operations.

# Test: Search for the function usage in both JavaScript and TypeScript files.
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -tjs -A 5 $'handleAuthentication'
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -tjs -A 5 $'fetchPageDescriptionBinary'
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -tjs -A 5 $'updatePageDescription'
Length of output: 177

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `handleAuthentication` and database operations.

# Test: Search for the function usage in all file types.
rg -A 5 $'handleAuthentication'
rg -A 5 $'fetchPageDescriptionBinary'
rg -A 5 $'updatePageDescription'
Length of output: 2805
packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-collaborative-editor.ts (3)

1-16: Imports look good.

The imports are necessary and relevant for the functionality provided in the file.

Line range hint 18-35: Type definition looks good.

The CollaborativeEditorProps type definition is comprehensive and includes all necessary properties for the collaborative editor.

Line range hint 38-107: Function implementation looks good.

The useCollaborativeEditor function is well-structured and handles the initialization and cleanup of the provider and editor effectively.

docker-compose-local.yml (1)

89-102: Service definition looks good.

The live service definition is comprehensive and includes all necessary configurations.

packages/editor/src/core/extensions/code/without-props.tsx (6)

1-5: Imports look good.

The imported modules and components are necessary for the functionality implemented in this file.

7-8: Lowlight configuration is correct.

The lowlight instance is correctly created and TypeScript syntax highlighting is registered.

10-32: Handle potential errors gracefully.

The Tab key handling is implemented correctly, but ensure that the error handling provides meaningful feedback to the user.

33-67: Handle potential errors gracefully.

The ArrowUp key handling is implemented correctly, but ensure that the error handling provides meaningful feedback to the user.

68-108: Handle potential errors gracefully.

The ArrowDown key handling is implemented correctly, but ensure that the error handling provides meaningful feedback to the user.

111-115: Configuration looks good.

The CustomCodeBlockExtensionWithoutProps is correctly configured with lowlight and default options.

live/src/page.ts (4)

1-14: Imports look good.

The imported modules and components are necessary for the functionality implemented in this file.

23-69: Ensure proper error handling and logging.

The updatePageDescription function correctly handles binary data conversion and interaction with the page service. Ensure that error handling provides meaningful feedback to the user.

71-107: Ensure proper error handling and logging.

The fetchDescriptionHTMLAndTransform function correctly handles data conversion and interaction with the page service. Ensure that error handling provides meaningful feedback to the user.

109-144: Ensure proper error handling and logging.

The fetchPageDescriptionBinary function correctly handles binary data fetching and interaction with the page service. Ensure that error handling provides meaningful feedback to the user.

web/core/components/pages/editor/header/options-dropdown.tsx (2)

Line range hint 1-22:
Prop removal looks good.

The removal of the handleSaveDescription prop simplifies the component and does not affect its functionality.

Line range hint 24-144:
Component simplification looks good.

The PageOptionsDropdown component correctly handles user interactions and performs the necessary actions without the handleSaveDescription prop. The changes simplify the component and improve maintainability.

packages/editor/src/core/extensions/custom-link/extension.tsx (1)

Line range hint 139-143:
Verify the implications of removing the HTMLElement check.

The change simplifies the conditional check by removing the HTMLElement check. Ensure that this does not introduce unintended behavior by allowing non-HTMLElement nodes to proceed further in the logic.

web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/pages/(detail)/header.tsx (1)

Line range hint 10-34:
Verify the alignment of button removal with design goals.

The removal of the button functionality and related state management indicates a significant change in user interaction. Ensure that this change aligns with the overall design and user experience goals.

web/core/components/pages/editor/editor-body.tsx (3)

1-11: Verify the correctness of new imports.

Ensure that the new imports for collaborative document editors are correctly implemented and do not introduce any issues.

92-102: Verify the correctness of realtimeConfig object.

Ensure that the realtimeConfig object created using useMemo is correctly implemented and provides the necessary configuration for real-time collaboration.

Line range hint 138-182:
Ensure proper implementation of collaborative document editors.

Verify that the CollaborativeDocumentEditorWithRef and CollaborativeDocumentReadOnlyEditorWithRef components are correctly implemented and support real-time collaboration features as intended.

packages/editor/src/core/hooks/use-editor.ts (2)

Line range hint 33-33: LGTM! But verify the impact of removing the provider property.

The removal of the provider property from the CustomEditorProps interface simplifies the props passed to the useEditor hook.

However, ensure that all references to provider are removed or updated throughout the codebase.

70-72: LGTM! But verify the impact on synchronization capabilities.

The removal of references to the provider object indicates a significant change in the control flow.

However, ensure that the editor's synchronization capabilities are not adversely affected.

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/bulk_operations.py (4)

24-24: LGTM!

The import of ERROR_CODES improves the maintainability of the code by centralizing error code management.

63-76: LGTM!

The use of descriptive keys from the ERROR_CODES dictionary enhances readability and allows for easier updates to error codes in the future.

134-136: LGTM!

The use of a descriptive key from the ERROR_CODES dictionary enhances readability and allows for easier updates to error codes in the future.

170-172: LGTM!

The use of a descriptive key from the ERROR_CODES dictionary enhances readability and allows for easier updates to error codes in the future.

apiserver/plane/app/views/issue/archive.py (2)

49-49: LGTM!

The import of ERROR_CODES improves the maintainability of the code by centralizing error code management.

345-348: LGTM!

The use of a descriptive key from the ERROR_CODES dictionary enhances readability and allows for easier updates to error codes in the future.

apiserver/plane/app/views/page/base.py (1)

Line range hint 15-18:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to partial_update match the new error handling logic.

web/core/components/issues/issue-modal/form.tsx (3)

185-185: LGTM!

The use of as const enhances type inference and prevents runtime errors.

188-188: LGTM!

The use of as const enhances type inference and prevents runtime errors.

330-330: LGTM!

The use of as const enhances type inference and prevents runtime errors.

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:16Z

live/src/index.ts

+        return new Promise(async () => {
+          if (documentType === "project_page") {
+            await updatePageDescription(params, pageId, state, cookie);
+          }
+        });


Avoid using async in Promise executor functions.

The Promise executor functions should not be async as it can lead to unexpected behavior.

- return new Promise(async () => { + return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { + (async () => { if (documentType === "project_page") { await updatePageDescription(params, pageId, state, cookie); } resolve(); + })().catch(reject); });

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

return new Promise(async () => {

if (documentType === "project_page") {

await updatePageDescription(params, pageId, state, cookie);

}

});

return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

(async () => {

if (documentType === "project_page") {

await updatePageDescription(params, pageId, state, cookie);

}

resolve();

})().catch(reject);

});

Tools

Biome

[error] 82-86: Promise executor functions should not be async.

(lint/suspicious/noAsyncPromiseExecutor)

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:17Z

live/src/index.ts

+        return new Promise(async (resolve) => {
+          if (documentType === "project_page") {
+            const fetchedData = await fetchPageDescriptionBinary(
+              params,
+              pageId,
+              cookie,
+            );
+            resolve(fetchedData);
+          }
+        });


Avoid using async in Promise executor functions.

The Promise executor functions should not be async as it can lead to unexpected behavior.

- return new Promise(async (resolve) => { + return new Promise((resolve) => { + (async () => { if (documentType === "project_page") { const fetchedData = await fetchPageDescriptionBinary( params, pageId, cookie, ); resolve(fetchedData); } + })(); });

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

return new Promise(async (resolve) => {

if (documentType === "project_page") {

const fetchedData = await fetchPageDescriptionBinary(

params,

pageId,

cookie,

);

resolve(fetchedData);

}

});

return new Promise((resolve) => {

(async () => {

if (documentType === "project_page") {

const fetchedData = await fetchPageDescriptionBinary(

params,

pageId,

cookie,

);

resolve(fetchedData);

}

})();

});

Tools

Biome

[error] 57-66: Promise executor functions should not be async.

(lint/suspicious/noAsyncPromiseExecutor)

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:17Z

live/src/services/api.service.ts

+  post(url: string, data = {}, config = {}) {
+    return this.axiosInstance.post(url, data, config);
+  }


Consider adding error handling to the post method.

The method correctly makes the POST request with the provided data and config, but it lacks error handling.

+ try { return this.axiosInstance.post(url, data, config); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + console.error("POST request failed", error); + throw error; + }

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

post(url: string, data = {}, config = {}) {

return this.axiosInstance.post(url, data, config);

}

post(url: string, data = {}, config = {}) {

try {

return this.axiosInstance.post(url, data, config);

} catch (error) {

// Handle error appropriately

console.error("POST request failed", error);

throw error;

}

}

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:17Z

live/src/services/api.service.ts

+  get(url: string, params = {}, config = {}) {
+    return this.axiosInstance.get(url, {
+      ...params,
+      ...config,
+    });
+  }


Consider adding error handling to the get method.

The method correctly merges parameters and config before making the GET request, but it lacks error handling.

+ try { return this.axiosInstance.get(url, { ...params, ...config, }); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + console.error("GET request failed", error); + throw error; + }

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

get(url: string, params = {}, config = {}) {

return this.axiosInstance.get(url, {

...params,

...config,

});

}

get(url: string, params = {}, config = {}) {

try {

return this.axiosInstance.get(url, {

...params,

...config,

});

} catch (error) {

// Handle error appropriately

console.error("GET request failed", error);

throw error;

}

}

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:17Z

live/src/services/api.service.ts

+  delete(url: string, data?: any, config = {}) {
+    return this.axiosInstance.delete(url, { data, ...config });
+  }


Consider adding error handling to the delete method.

The method correctly makes the DELETE request with the provided data and config, but it lacks error handling.

+ try { return this.axiosInstance.delete(url, { data, ...config }); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + console.error("DELETE request failed", error); + throw error; + }

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

delete(url: string, data?: any, config = {}) {

return this.axiosInstance.delete(url, { data, ...config });

}

delete(url: string, data?: any, config = {}) {

try {

return this.axiosInstance.delete(url, { data, ...config });

} catch (error) {

// Handle error appropriately

console.error("DELETE request failed", error);

throw error;

}

}

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:18Z

live/src/services/page.service.ts

+  async fetchDescriptionBinary(
+    workspaceSlug: string,
+    projectId: string,
+    pageId: string,
+    cookie: string,
+  ): Promise<any> {
+    return this.get(
+      `/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/pages/${pageId}/description/`,
+      {
+        headers: {
+          "Content-Type": "application/octet-stream",
+          Cookie: cookie,
+        },
+        responseType: "arraybuffer",
+      },
+    )
+      .then((response) => response?.data)
+      .catch((error) => {
+        throw error?.response?.data;
+      });


Consider adding logging for better debugging.

Adding logging can help trace issues more effectively when fetching the binary description.

- .catch((error) => { - throw error?.response?.data; - }); + .catch((error) => { + console.error("Error fetching binary description:", error); + throw error?.response?.data; + });

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

async fetchDescriptionBinary(

workspaceSlug: string,

projectId: string,

pageId: string,

cookie: string,

): Promise<any> {

return this.get(

`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/pages/${pageId}/description/`,

{

headers: {

"Content-Type": "application/octet-stream",

Cookie: cookie,

},

responseType: "arraybuffer",

},

)

.then((response) => response?.data)

.catch((error) => {

throw error?.response?.data;

});

async fetchDescriptionBinary(

workspaceSlug: string,

projectId: string,

pageId: string,

cookie: string,

): Promise<any> {

return this.get(

`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/pages/${pageId}/description/`,

{

headers: {

"Content-Type": "application/octet-stream",

Cookie: cookie,

},

responseType: "arraybuffer",

},

)

.then((response) => response?.data)

.catch((error) => {

console.error("Error fetching binary description:", error);

throw error?.response?.data;

});

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:18Z

live/src/services/page.service.ts

+  async fetchDetails(
+    workspaceSlug: string,
+    projectId: string,
+    pageId: string,
+    cookie: string,
+  ): Promise<TPage> {
+    return this.get(
+      `/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/pages/${pageId}/`,
+      {
+        headers: {
+          Cookie: cookie,
+        },
+      },
+    )
+      .then((response) => response?.data)
+      .catch((error) => {
+        throw error?.response?.data;
+      });


Consider adding logging for better debugging.

While the method correctly handles errors by throwing the response data, adding logging can help trace issues more effectively.

- .catch((error) => { - throw error?.response?.data; - }); + .catch((error) => { + console.error("Error fetching page details:", error); + throw error?.response?.data; + });

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

async fetchDetails(

workspaceSlug: string,

projectId: string,

pageId: string,

cookie: string,

): Promise<TPage> {

return this.get(

`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/pages/${pageId}/`,

{

headers: {

Cookie: cookie,

},

},

)

.then((response) => response?.data)

.catch((error) => {

throw error?.response?.data;

});

async fetchDetails(

workspaceSlug: string,

projectId: string,

pageId: string,

cookie: string,

): Promise<TPage> {

return this.get(

`/api/workspaces/${workspaceSlug}/projects/${projectId}/pages/${pageId}/`,

{

headers: {

Cookie: cookie,

},

},

)

.then((response) => response?.data)

.catch((error) => {

console.error("Error fetching page details:", error);

throw error?.response?.data;

});

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:18Z

live/Dockerfile.channel

+COPY ./channel/package*.json ./
+
+# Install dependencies
+RUN yarn install


Consider using npm ci for a more deterministic build.

Using yarn install is fine, but npm ci can provide a more deterministic build by installing exactly what is in the package-lock.json.

- RUN yarn install + RUN npm ci

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

RUN yarn install

RUN npm ci

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:18Z

live/Dockerfile.channel

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Use a Node.js base image
+FROM node:latest


Use a specific version tag for the base image.

Using node:latest can lead to unpredictable builds. Consider using a specific version tag to ensure consistency.

- FROM node:latest + FROM node:14

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

FROM node:latest

FROM node:14

coderabbitai · 2024-07-26T13:36:18Z

live/Dockerfile.channel

+EXPOSE 3003
+
+# Start the Node.js server
+CMD ["node", "dist/index.js"]


Consider using a process manager like PM2.

Using node dist/index.js is fine, but a process manager like PM2 can provide better process management and monitoring.

- CMD ["node", "dist/index.js"] + RUN yarn global add pm2 + CMD ["pm2-runtime", "dist/index.js"]

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

CMD ["node", "dist/index.js"]

CMD ["node", "dist/index.js"]

RUN yarn global add pm2

CMD ["pm2-runtime", "dist/index.js"]

fix: merge conflicts resolved from preview

7f11f40

aaryan610 added this to the v0.23-dev milestone Jul 26, 2024

aaryan610 added ✨feature 🌐frontend labels Jul 26, 2024

aaryan610 marked this pull request as draft July 26, 2024 13:32

coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 26, 2024

View reviewed changes

aaryan610 closed this Sep 4, 2024

aaryan610 deleted the feat-pages-realtime branch September 4, 2024 11:31

[WEB-1116] fix: pages realtime server #5245

[WEB-1116] fix: pages realtime server #5245

Uh oh!

Conversation

aaryan610 commented Jul 26, 2024 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

Documentation and Community

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot Jul 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

aaryan610 commented Jul 26, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)